Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FlyingToaster (talk | contribs) at 18:48, 17 April 2006 (cleanup. this article still needs more research and dates/years to clarify some ambiguous historical information - most of these edits are stylistic). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article uses first-person (I, we) or second-person (you) inappropriately. Please help rewrite it to use a more formal, encyclopedic tone.

Hutu is the name given to one of the three ethnic groups occupying Burundi and Rwanda. 85% of Rwandans and 85% of Burundians are Hutu. This division is based more upon social class than ethnicity, as there are no significant language or cultural differences between the Hutu and the other ethnic groups in the area, notably the Tutsi. Historically, these groups have differed in average height and physical appearance, but today the differences are blurred. Some scholars also point out the important role the Belgian colonisers had in creating the idea of a combined Hutu and Tutsi race, known as the Hamitic controversy.

The Hutu arrived in the Great Lakes region around the 1st century, displacing the Twa. The Hutu dominated the area with a series of small kingdoms until the 15th century. At that time, it is believed that the Tutsi came into the area from Ethiopia and conquered the Hutu (this is widely disputed--see below). The Tutsi monarchy survived until the end of the colonial era in the 1950s, when the Belgian rulers used the ethnic division to support their rule. The Tutsi monarchy soon fell and the area was divided into Rwanda and Burundi in 1962. The Tutsi nonetheless remained dominant in Burundi, while the Hutu gained a degree of dominance in Rwanda until 1994.

The idea of the ethnic group in Rwanda has a long and complicated history. If the term "ethnic group" is meant to mean a collection of people who share a language or culture, Rwanda only has one ethnic group, the Rwandans, who share a similar culture and speak the language Kinyarwanda. Since there is no recorded history in Rwanda, precisely what these terms referred to prioir to the arrival of the colonists is unknown. Since then, the meaning of the terms "Hutu" and "Tutsi" has changed over time. The Tutsis at one point assoicated themselves with the Rwandan monarchy while the Hutu were more frequently impoverished. When the Belgian colonists conducted a census, they defined "Tutsi" and anyone with more than ten cows and "Hutu" and anyone with less than ten cows. The German colonists were amazed by the prominent, "European-like" noses of some Rwandans; they wove fanciful historical and racial theories to explain how some Africans acquired such noses. In addition, they were amazed by the organized society existing in the Kingdom of Rwanda. According to these early twentieth-century Europeans, some of whom would later be implicated in the genocide of the Jews (1939-1945), such organization and such noses could only be explained by European descent, transmitted by way of Ethiopia. Thus arose the great myth that the "Tutsis" came from Ethiopia, which is repeated even today (examples: CNN article, PBS article). However, these remain historical myths and rumours without the slightest shred of physical evidence to support them. They also point to a major double-standard; if a major media organization claimed that a supposed segment of the population of France, for example, came from Pakistan, they would be expected to support the claim with actual evidence. Even if Westerners still repeat the myths associated with "Hutus" and "Tutsis", many Rwandans now recognize that these ideas have no relevance to reality.

See also

• L'Afrique Hundreds of articles and photographs of Rwanda

External links

• A traveler learns about the Hutu and Tutsi conflict and reflects on it
• http://www.newint.org/issue260/keynote.htm
• http://www.africaaction.org/bp/ethcen.htm

• Ethnic groups in Rwanda
• Ethnic groups in Burundi