This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lerdthenerd (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 22 May 2012 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:40, 22 May 2012 by Lerdthenerd (talk | contribs) (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Reported
I've reported the Kosovo altercation at WP:ANI. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, let's see how this pans out. Ottomanist (talk) 07:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Kosovo
It strikes me that the question of whether to merge Kosovo with Republic of Kosovo has nothing whatsoever to do with paid editing and prospective financial rewards and everything to do with nationalism. I have no opinion on the basic issue, but I'd encourage you to open your mind to the possibility that the alternative path to the one you favor on this matter is correct. Carrite (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
indeed, but i couldn't care less about nationalism. I'm only slight annoyed that the page is hijacked by nationalist opinions- why should we accept this? Ottomanist (talk) 19:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Kosovo
As far as I know I have not edited anything to do with Kosovo, other than airports, and thus have closed that discussion as no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 00:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. violating the 1RR rule on an article Lerdthenerd wiki defender 19:40, 22 May 2012 (UTC)