This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nat Krause (talk | contribs) at 00:40, 22 April 2006 (Buddhism, etc.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:40, 22 April 2006 by Nat Krause (talk | contribs) (Buddhism, etc.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hinduism Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
I removed the reference to monotheism. I have nothing against it, I just couldn't see the logical connection. Prater 20:25, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Cult image
The current text states that Murthi is a Cult image. The Cult image states that a cult image is made by man. This is incorrect, for Murthi need not be sculpted or formed by man. For example, Dwaraka Sila , Salagrama Sila , Govardhana Sila are not formed by man, nor is Amarnath Sivalingam , all of which are worshipped. I think the original text of "deities or images" is superior. --BostonMA 22:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
A second reason why "deity" is more suitable than "cult image". Trimurthi refers to three deities, or to three forms of a single god. It does not refer to three "images". --BostonMA 00:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Buddhism, etc.
Are there examples somewhere of the term murti being used to describe Buddhist statuary? If not, I'm not sure why Buddhism should be mentioned on this article any more than Christian icons, etc. would be. Also, is this sentence NPOV?: "This view of murtis being 'idols' misapplies Abrahamic ideas to Hindu practices and fails to reflect actual Vedic philosophy and Hindu belief." Clearly, a Christian or Muslim critique of Hindu practices does apply Abrahamic ideas; that it is a misapplication sounds like someone's opinion. - Nat Krause 00:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Categories: