Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wtshymanski

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Canoe1967 (talk | contribs) at 19:00, 7 July 2012 (Welcome back: need your wisdom). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:00, 7 July 2012 by Canoe1967 (talk | contribs) (Welcome back: need your wisdom)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Extended content

This page has been blanked. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) ..again.

Peerages

Per MOS:HONORIFIC and WP:NCPEER, it is common practice to use official styling in the infoboxes for nobility and peers. --Tærkast (Discuss) 20:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Combine the Misplaced Pages manual of style and a peerage system and you're bound to get absurdities. Surelyl WP:COMMONNAME trumps? It's not as if Bennett inherited the title or passed it on and he only held his "peerage" for a couple of years. Finally, given the reputation of Canadians who acquired peerages, surely if someone was collecting viscounts they'd be as well served with a redirect to R.B. Bennett? --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski

I don't trust you. This makes meaningful discussion difficult (see Cold War). Your professed concern for my legacy is doubtless some strategey of yours which I am too thick to figure out. I've learned that making complex hypothetical mental models of the behavior of other people rarely give me any meaningful insight into their next actions and is never worth the effort. To "edit" is also sometimes to delete. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip!

Dear Wtshymanski, thanks for the tip about adding pages to your watchlist. I can't believe it was that simple. Best regards, Patrick Gill (talk) 16:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC).

And see

But I'm being called stupid. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Intermittent energy source

Hi, Wtshymanski. You participated in the discussion about the intermittent energy source and therefore I inform you that there is a discussion about merging Intermittent energy source and Variable Renewable Energy articles. Your opinion is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 14:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of St. Joseph Wind Farm

The article St. Joseph Wind Farm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject matter not notable as it is a modest sized project

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 14:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Personal radio service

The article Personal radio service has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Material is complete duplication of material in other articles.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result of Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski

Hello, I have closed the above discussion with the following result:

"All six or so registered editors who have participated in this RfC agree that Wtshymanski's mode of contributing to Misplaced Pages is disruptive. They agree that some of his contributions have merit, but that this is far outweighed by what the commentators consider to be a rude and battleground-like conduct and a lack of the collaborative spirit required for the participation in this project.
Considering that Wtshymanski has not edited since 16 May 2012, no immediate administrative action appears required. However, I invite Wtshymanski to take the concerns voiced here under serious consideration. Administrative action may be requested if the conduct that has been the focus of this discussion continues."

Regards,  Sandstein  11:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome back

I added a section to an article that I need your wisdom on. Talk:Hot_water_storage_tank It has been years since I have worked on one of these. Could you take a look if you get a chance?--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)