Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kaini (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 9 July 2012 (: rsp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sole and the Skyrider Band (album)

The article you created above is a duplicate of Sole and the Skyrider Band, and so I have merged the contents of both articles and redirected the duplicate article back to the original article. You are free to edit the original article but please leave the redirected article as it is.

Currently we have articles named Sole and the Skyrider Band (band) and Sole and the Skyrider Band, but requests can easily be made to alter them (and this will also retain the article's edit histories). memphisto 08:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you recently tried to give Sole and the Skyrider Band a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Misplaced Pages has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Misplaced Pages:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Just linking the above since it has useful information Muhandes (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Bracken (band), etc.

Please see the talk page for this article; simply reverting my edits while using the same reasoning is unconstructive. Chubbles (talk) 16:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit Warring report notice

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chubbles (talk • contribs) 19:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I Don't Care.

Moved material

Since the talk page is for discussion and not for article drafts, I took the liberty and moved the material to User:Tasketz Kayo/Sandbox. I hope you find this useful. --Muhandes (talk) 16:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate your input. But I can't edit the sandbox since I've been blocked. This talk page is the only one I can edit now. --Tasketz Kayo (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I didn't realize that, I was just trying to be helpful. I don't know if it is against any policy to do it on your talk page, I guess you can try copying it all back here and see. Seriously, it is a shame you keep getting into edit wars, cause I think that in general you can make valuable contributions. --Muhandes (talk) 07:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• Since youo have resumed the previous edit war, and since you have continued to also give other indications of unwillingness to edit collaborativley, you have been blocked again. When the block expires, please try to understand the collaborative nature of Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages does not work by individuals inisiting on forcing their preferred edits through by edit warring, nor by threats or angry remarks to those we disagree with. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Which part of my edits are you talking about? --Tasketz Kayo (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Chubbles is ignoring Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style on Baths (musician) etc., so I warned him on his talk page and reverted his edits. Am I wrong? --Tasketz Kayo (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Tasketz Kayo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=] blocked me with an expiry time of 1 month because of "Continuing the same edit war as before, and other indications of unwillingness to edit collaboratively." Acutually, ] and I are doing edit war at several articles such as ], ], ] and ]. It is obvious that adding the label and release date information to the musician's Discography section is not required (]). I told it to Chubbles, removed the label and release date info and did some cleanup to the articles. But he reverted all the changes without even checking the diff. So I had to warn Chubbles on his talk page because he had ignored ] and ] through this edit war. And as soon as I reverted his edits again, JamesBWatson blocked me again. How can I edit more collaboratively? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=] blocked me with an expiry time of 1 month because of "Continuing the same edit war as before, and other indications of unwillingness to edit collaboratively." Acutually, ] and I are doing edit war at several articles such as ], ], ] and ]. It is obvious that adding the label and release date information to the musician's Discography section is not required (]). I told it to Chubbles, removed the label and release date info and did some cleanup to the articles. But he reverted all the changes without even checking the diff. So I had to warn Chubbles on his talk page because he had ignored ] and ] through this edit war. And as soon as I reverted his edits again, JamesBWatson blocked me again. How can I edit more collaboratively? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=] blocked me with an expiry time of 1 month because of "Continuing the same edit war as before, and other indications of unwillingness to edit collaboratively." Acutually, ] and I are doing edit war at several articles such as ], ], ] and ]. It is obvious that adding the label and release date information to the musician's Discography section is not required (]). I told it to Chubbles, removed the label and release date info and did some cleanup to the articles. But he reverted all the changes without even checking the diff. So I had to warn Chubbles on his talk page because he had ignored ] and ] through this edit war. And as soon as I reverted his edits again, JamesBWatson blocked me again. How can I edit more collaboratively? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.

Editing collaboratively means discussing your desired changes on the article's talk page when you know that other users disagree, and creating consensus before making the changes. I can't find any evidence that you did this- or even that you know that you are supposed to do it. Can you link to any edit where you politely entered into a discussion of this with other users, and explained what you were trying to do? This is a template warning that would be used for a brand new user who doesn't know the manual of style exists, but it doesn't explain what you are doing or why, and it's a little insulting to use a newbie template on an experienced editor. You don't seem to have attempted to edit collaboratively at any point since your last block. Do you understand that 'collaboration' means working together with other people to make decisions? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

If I might add to this, the cycle is WP:BRD. Bold, Revert, Discuss. The cycle you seem to be adhering to is Bold, Revert. No discuss whatsoever. Another editor has already pointed out below this why your reverts are counterproductive. This is an an encyclopaedia. We should be aiming to communicate as much information in as little space as is possible. Whether it looks pretty as far as you're concerned is very far down the list of what's important - before that comes relevance and verifiability to name two things. I'll echo Chubbles's comment from earlier - I am also in no doubt that you want to improve wiki. You're not a vandal. You just need to work with other people, because that's the way things are done on wikipedia. Kaini (talk) 22:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Label and release date information in discographies

This info is relevant in an artists discography - infact, the style guideline you link to confirms it: Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Lists of works#Discographies. When there are matters of opinion on Misplaced Pages it is always a good idea to look at the most popular articles (because this is where concensus is usually arrived at first), so I suggest you look at The Beatles discography where label and release date information are both included. memphisto 22:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock