This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Brad Watson, Miami (talk | contribs) at 17:37, 13 July 2012 (→Hisab al-Jummal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:37, 13 July 2012 by Brad Watson, Miami (talk | contribs) (→Hisab al-Jummal)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Writing systems Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Allah = 37 claim
What does "consecutive repeating letters count as single" mean? Consonants with shadda are certainly only counted once, but in Allah there are actually two letters Lam, not only a shadda. You can only get 37 by omitting one of the Lam's (which is a real actual letter) and counting the diacritic alif (which is not a letter, merely a diacritic). Who does reduction of words to numerical values in this manner, and what evidence do you have for it? There's plenty of evidence that many people sum بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم to 786. AnonMoos 15:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Questions
- Is this written with the most significant digit on the left or the right?
- Is there a representation of zero?
- Is there a representation for fractions?
-- Beland 04:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think you have a misunderstanding of what Abjad numerals are, and what they're used for. They're letters of the ordinary Arabic alphabet given numerical interpretations in several particular specific contexts, such as:
- 1) Labelling a sequence of items (such as subsection headings) from 1-28, using single letters listed in one of the Abjad orders given on the article page.
- 2) Somewhat archaically on astrolabes and in a few other mostly-historical contexts, always to represent positive integers (most often positive integers less than 2,000).
- 3) To sum the letters in a word for mystical-religious-occult numerological analysis.
- That's about it. For a cultural analogue think Roman numerals (MDCLXVI), but without the rule that writing lesser before bigger means subtraction (therefore making the order of writing the symbols somewhat unimportant). Roman numerals don't have a representation for zero or fractions... AnonMoos 09:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Hisab al-Jummal
The Abjad numbers are also used to assign numerical values to Arabic words for purposes of gematria/isopsephy & numerology which is referred to in Arabic as Hisab al-Jummal. - Brad Watson, Miami, FL 75.74.156.102 (talk) 15:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- Your edits to the article were not too useful, since you replaced a valid working link to "isopsephy" with an invalid non-working link (see the red color in your remarks above?). AnonMoos (talk) 17:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Levantine order
"Levantine order" redirects to this article, however, the focus of this article is not Levantine; there is only a brief mention that Hebrew has a different order at the very end of the article. If "Levantine order" is to redirect here, would it be better to either expand on the the Levantine order within this article (which I'm not sure would actually fit that well in this article's context), or — I think better — have a separate article called "Levantine order" which expands on the orders used in the Levant (such as by the Ugaritic and Hebrew ordering)? — al-Shimoni (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not sure what "Levantine order" means, or if it's an accepted scholarly term, but if it refers to non-Arabic alphabets, then this article doesn't cover it... AnonMoos (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)