This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Y not math (talk | contribs) at 20:20, 26 July 2012 (→Indian Century: query re: article necessity). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:20, 26 July 2012 by Y not math (talk | contribs) (→Indian Century: query re: article necessity)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)India Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian Century article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Indian Century
Indian century is as common a term as Chinese century is so why some users r objecting against making this pageLAKSJD1 21:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
India is often called the next big superpower it has a thriving economy, third largest military, large land area, large population, nukes, stable and democratic government etc. LAKSJD1 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKSJD1 (talk • contribs)
Do we really need a neologism for a possibility? In fact, does it make sense to create an encyclopedia article on a personal/non-scientific hypothesis? If it was a movement, or an ideology, it might have made sense to document it, but this is not that either. I'm pretty sure the British and American centuries were named in hindsight, not as a prophecies. Y not math (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Y_not_math (talk
Categories: