This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.37.29.229 (talk) at 21:48, 4 August 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:48, 4 August 2012 by 68.37.29.229 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
|
Template:Archive box collapsible
Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2
Hi LF. The FLC linked above could use a re-review, to see if your final batch of comments were addressed to your satisfaction. I understand you must be annoyed at how long it has taken for some issues to be fixed, but we're getting near the point where a decision must be made on the list, and I want to know where you stand on whatever edits have been made. Thanks. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
K.Michelle merging
The correct spelling is the one without the space "K.Michelle". The other article "K. Michelle" should be merged to that one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.234.89.102 (talk) 00:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
episode list
I do not have time to follow Wiki protocol here so please excuse. Please research "promotional" as it applies to Wiki copyright policies before you delete any more content on The Real Housewives of NJ episode page again. The particular content that you have repeatedly deleted is posted online at the NBCU media village, where it is freely available for promotional use. Your reason for repeatedly deleting the episode descriptions is/was, "copyright" violation, so maybe you will understand that it is not a copyright violation. There was a complaint on the main RHWONJ page about too much "promotional" info being used, but that is not the reason that you are giving for deleting it. Personally, I think that it is TOO promotional in nature, but as I first directed you, go look at many many other television show Wikis and you will see that many use the network promos for episode descriptions. I really hope that you don't want to make an issue of this because I don't have time for this right now, so can you make an issue with some other show if you must?68.37.29.229 (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Like Fuzz said, its a copyright violation; read WP:COPYVIO. TBrandley 22:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Look-if I waste my time schooling you guys about this by finding and giving you a link to the Misplaced Pages page where this is cited as "promotional" use-will you give it a rest?68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am assuming you missed this on the bottom of the NBCUMV page? © 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc. Copyright © 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Permission is hereby granted for use of the photo herein depicting the NBCUniversal program solely for editorial purposes in newspapers and periodicals to promote the NBCUniversal program only and for no other purpose. I stand by my statements, it is a copyright violation, and you are clearly misinformed. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
May I direct you to Misplaced Pages's non free use policy? Quoted from Wiki's page: "Other promotional material: Posters, programs, billboards, ads. For critical commentary." that covers the use understand? Wiki ALLOWS promotional use so it is EXACTLY what you have posted is NBC's policy.68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- That section you are quoting from (WP:NFCI) is regarding images. Please read the sections on text. This is not a case of acceptable Non-Free Use. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
>*************************************************************************< !!!!!!!This topic has been updated on my talk page and elsewhere. If you want to continue behaving like the "CopyVio"-police instead-of addressing the issue, have fun. Either way I will win-because I already know that I am correct, at this point I am mainly waiting to see what happens. Maybe you should ask yourself this question, "How could someone make legal claims of copyright protection on something that was distributed widely to the media and public as promotional material and media information?-and WHY would it be an issue to the content creator?" About the only thing that you are correct about is that the content was copied verbatim, which yes, is generally a "CopyVio"-but in this case it is "non-free Use" I assure you. Maybe English is not your language? Or you are so busy that you use a bot to find "CopyVio"-----but this is not what is meant by "CopyVio" even-though it is verbatim cut and paste. `ohsorrysignbot