This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fezmar9 (talk | contribs) at 06:31, 26 September 2012 (sigh...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:31, 26 September 2012 by Fezmar9 (talk | contribs) (sigh...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Demons (Sleigh Bells song)
- Demons (Sleigh Bells song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSONG criteria, specifically: "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." After conducting my own research, the majority of the articles out there merely mention a music video exists, or the song gets mentioned in a review. There's not much information specifically pertaining to this song that one could plausibly expand the article very much beyond what it is now. Fezmar9 (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Seriously, what is your problem? Are you still forum shopping? Third opinion didn't work, the Discographies WikiProject didn't work, DRN didn't work, so now you're coming to AfD? All this is making yourself look bad, you know. (And at the very least, the article could be merged to Reign of Terror (album).) Erpert 06:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Our other dispute is regarding the definition of a single. This AFD is based purely on notability and warranting an independent article. These are two entirely different things. Please either contribute constructive, relevent comments to this discussion, or don't comment at all. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Merge to Reign of Terror (album). There's fairly wide coverage of this single (, , , , , , , , ) but nothing that has enough to really justify a standalone article. --Michig (talk) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)