Misplaced Pages

User talk:The "good guy"

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KoshVorlon (talk | contribs) at 11:15, 3 October 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:15, 3 October 2012 by KoshVorlon (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy.

Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page.

You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to Deletion.%5B%5BWikipedia%3AMiscellany+for+deletion%2FUser+talk%3AThe+%26%2334%3Bgood+guy%26%2334%3B%5D%5DMFD


Maintenance use only: Place either {{mfd}} or {{mfdx|2nd}} on the page nominated for deletion. Then subst {{subst:mfd2|pg=User talk:The "good guy"|text=...}} to create the discussion subpage. Finally, subst {{subst:mfd3|pg=User talk:The "good guy"}} into the MfD log. Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing {{subst:MFDWarning|User talk:The "good guy"}} ~~~~ on their talk page(s).
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The "good guy" (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Vandal Sαck (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

Would clearly imply an intent to edit disruptively and be prejudicial to good faith regardless of how the account actually edited. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The "good guy" (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Sαck (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

Reading this, I assume that you are planning disruption. Other users would assume the same thing, and it would make it difficult to collaborate. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages requires that users get along well with each other, even in high-conflict situations. Your first three username choices give the strong impression that you take pleasure from irritating others. Perhaps you didn't intend to give that impression, and this is all a misunderstanding. I hope that my description of how your talk page strikes me, a reasonably fair person, will be helpful to you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you and I will take this to heart. I just haven't felt like being very creative or like giving Misplaced Pages a creation (a username) that is other than what Misplaced Pages has already assigned me as. I don't feel like giving Misplaced Pages much more than it has given me. I also recognize that I'm being judged on my account rather than on the quality of my IP edits. I'm using something of a mercenary approach but I will need to take this credentialing issue up later if at all. IP 12.153.112.21 (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

The "good guy" (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

the "good guy" (talk · account availability check · rename user)Request reason: I do apologize, my first three guesses at valid usernames ran afoul of naming policy. I would appreciate the username the "good guy" with the quotemarks to ensure I can continue editing constructively; it appears this is consistent with all naming policies. Though there has been much sound and fury about the relevant IP address, the fracas essentially circles around one content disagreement with one editor about one article and it should be resolvable through ordinary channels. However, I would still appreciate being recognized as a good-faith editor. Thank you for your consideration. Again, unblock and move is preferred to new account, because of the need to preserve watchlist, histories, drafts, and transparency due to the previous use of the IP account.

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=the "good guy" | 3=I do apologize, my first three guesses at valid usernames ran afoul of naming policy. I would appreciate the username the "good guy" with the quotemarks to ensure I can continue editing constructively; it appears this is consistent with all naming policies. Though there has been much sound and fury about the relevant IP address, the fracas essentially circles around one content disagreement with one editor about one article and it should be resolvable through ordinary channels. However, I would still appreciate being recognized as a good-faith editor. Thank you for your consideration. Again, unblock and move is preferred to new account, because of the need to preserve watchlist, histories, drafts, and transparency due to the previous use of the IP account. | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=the "good guy" | reason=I do apologize, my first three guesses at valid usernames ran afoul of naming policy. I would appreciate the username the "good guy" with the quotemarks to ensure I can continue editing constructively; it appears this is consistent with all naming policies. Though there has been much sound and fury about the relevant IP address, the fracas essentially circles around one content disagreement with one editor about one article and it should be resolvable through ordinary channels. However, I would still appreciate being recognized as a good-faith editor. Thank you for your consideration. Again, unblock and move is preferred to new account, because of the need to preserve watchlist, histories, drafts, and transparency due to the previous use of the IP account. | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from ] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=the "good guy" | reason=I do apologize, my first three guesses at valid usernames ran afoul of naming policy. I would appreciate the username the "good guy" with the quotemarks to ensure I can continue editing constructively; it appears this is consistent with all naming policies. Though there has been much sound and fury about the relevant IP address, the fracas essentially circles around one content disagreement with one editor about one article and it should be resolvable through ordinary channels. However, I would still appreciate being recognized as a good-faith editor. Thank you for your consideration. Again, unblock and move is preferred to new account, because of the need to preserve watchlist, histories, drafts, and transparency due to the previous use of the IP account. | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

The following content is being userfied here due to pending AFD. It constitutes revision 514435971 and will be updated in place here. After a successful unblock request concludes, the content can be moved to and maintained at "User:.../List of AT&T U-verse channels" for potential resynchronization with community standards as they may appear at AFD and subsequent proposed community discussion about channel lineups. 12.153.112.21 (talk) 15:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

questionable use of IP user page: I do not believe this is an appropriate nor allowable use of an IP user talk page. I have brought it up for discussion Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard. -- The Red Pen of Doom 14:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice. Please do not break the page (by losing extended characters) while commenting. IP 12.153.112.21 (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Former Article

That article was deleted, therefore I've removed the article from your userspage, as it would not be allowed to remain Second, categories are also not allowed in userspace. You can re-create the article, but try using AFC instead. Thanks  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  11:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Categories: