This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lord Roem (talk | contribs) at 19:25, 25 October 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:25, 25 October 2012 by Lord Roem (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) edit count | edit summary usage
 Archives |
Notes
AfD
- tools:~betacommand/reports/afd
- tools:~betacommand/AFD.html
- tools:~snottywong/afdadminstats.html
- tools:~snottywong/afdstats.html
| Advanced search for: "Search" | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL · page history · Books Ngram Viewer
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL · toolserver ·
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ask Mathbot (talk · contribs) to refresh Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Old by accessing http://toolserver.org/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/afd/afd.cgi
Copyvio
Miscellaneous
- http://case-sensitive-search.appspot.com/ – provides case-sensitive filtering of Google searches
- Misplaced Pages:A Primer for newcomers
- User:Fæ/help/photo and Misplaced Pages:Contact OTRS
- http://www.ip-adress.com/ip_tracer/
- User:Giraffedata/comprised of
- User:SMcCandlish/Logical quotation
- User:Tony1/How to improve your writing
- Misplaced Pages:Template messages/Sources of articles
- Misplaced Pages:Did you know/DYKcheck: javascript:importScript('User:Shubinator/DYKcheck.js'); dykCheck();
Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement
By a vote of 9-1, the Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:
Remedy 4 ("Malleus Fatuorum topic banned") of Civility Enforcement is vacated, and replaced with the following:
Malleus is topic banned from making edits concerning the RFA process anywhere on the English Misplaced Pages. As an exception, he may ask questions of the candidates and express his own view on a candidate in a specific RFA (in the support, oppose, or neutral sections), but may not engage in any threaded discussions relating to RFA. An uninvolved admin may remove any comments in violation of this remedy, and may enforce it with blocks if necessary.
For the Arbitration Committee, --Lord Roem (talk) 19:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)