This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gimmetrow (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 30 October 2012 (Gimmetrow moved page Talk:Hummingbird Heartbeat (song) to Talk:Hummingbird Heartbeat: Match article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:57, 30 October 2012 by Gimmetrow (talk | contribs) (Gimmetrow moved page Talk:Hummingbird Heartbeat (song) to Talk:Hummingbird Heartbeat: Match article)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hummingbird Heartbeat was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 17, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hummingbird Heartbeat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
GA Review
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hummingbird Heartbeat (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Till (talk · contribs) 07:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Checking against GA Criteria
- taken from her second mainstream studio album Teenage Dream (2010) --> it's her third studio album, let's not beat around the bush.
Done
- Christopher "Tricky" Stewart; with the latter --> incorrect use of semi-colon
Done
- songs --> song's
Done
- The song was inspired by --> repetition of 'the song' from previous sentence, and is name is Russell not Russel.
Done
- Link music critics
Done
- ..many of which --> many of whom
Done
- ..peaking at 124, respectively --> 'respectively'? Seriously?
Not done I don't really see the problem, it finishes the sentence smoothly. Do you have any suggestions of what to change it to?
- You don't see the problem? 'Respectively' is used when referring to two or more items, in this case there is only one chart position of South Korea.
- According to digital sheet music published at Musicnotes.com by Sony-ATV Music Publishing --> unnecessary
- MTV News should NOT be in italics
- The lead sentence of the reception section needs a bit of a copyedit.
- As said before, 'the song' is a bit repetitive.
- ..said the song fit well with the original --> fit?
- ..and if released as a single, would help Perry be the only artist with six number-one singles on the Billboard Hot 100 --> I don't find this necessary here, it's just a bit out of place
- Why is there no mention of the song charting?
- About.com and MTV News should not be in italics
- Ref #10, Capitol Records does not belong there. It should be iTunes Store and Apple Inc.
- Why is there no mention in the article's body that the song was inspired by Russell Brand?
- The article is ABSOLUTELY NOT broad in its coverage.
Overall
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- This is an extremely short article. On hold to see if some serious improvements can be made. Till 07:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- As some of the issues haven't been addressed in the 8-day period, including a decent expansion, I'm failing this GAN. The article can be renominated at any time but I would suggest fixing these issues. Thanks. Till 00:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is an extremely short article. On hold to see if some serious improvements can be made. Till 07:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Katy Perry articles
- Mid-importance Katy Perry articles
- WikiProject Katy Perry articles
- B-Class Rock music articles
- Mid-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- B-Class electronic music articles
- Mid-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles
- B-Class song articles