This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timothy Usher (talk | contribs) at 09:38, 10 May 2006 (→IDs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:38, 10 May 2006 by Timothy Usher (talk | contribs) (→IDs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | User:ManiF is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Vlachs of Serbia
May I know the reason for restoring the article Vlachs of Serbia? greier 09:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- thanks for anwering. Please see talk page on Vlachs of Serbia and let`s discuss there from now on, if you want to continue to get involved in this dispute. Thanks :) greier 09:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Aucaman
This arbitration case is now closed and the decision is published.
For the Arbitration Committee. --14:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
I appreciate your work at Misplaced Pages :) The bosniaks article is constantly misstreated by anonomous users. However, Once again, Thanks! For the help that is. ^^ Damir Mišić 00:22, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
IDs
Not that I know of, but you're free to send me e-mail - mine's enabled. What's up?Timothy Usher 06:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- I hate to say it, but your recent presentation against Zora - who'd done nothing wrong - in the Aucaman case leaves me quite wary of dealing with you on that level. Perhaps this can change when some level of trust has been established.
- However I will say that you're free to challenge sources where you feel it appropriate.Timothy Usher 08:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- ManiF, I don't presume bad faith. But I stand by my words above. Zora is, in my experience, a knowledgable, honorable and otherwise admirable editor and I've a difficult time accepting your involvement in a failed attempt to bring sanctions upon her. Perhaps that's unfair of me. Time will tell.Timothy Usher 09:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)