Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SilkTork (talk | contribs) at 00:19, 22 January 2013 (→Asgardian_appeal: commenting). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

/Archive 2006-2008 /Archive 2009 /Archive 2010 /Archive 2011-2012

Proposed deletion of A Dozen and One Adventures

The article A Dozen and One Adventures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This game accessory fails Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 03:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - great way to start the year. BOZ (talk) 04:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Nothing on HighBeam for that or Dark Thane, unfortunately. —Torchiest _edits 05:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Secrets of the Lamp

The article Secrets of the Lamp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This game accessory fails Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

This user also added a PROD to Prisoner of Haven‎ and Sha' ir‎. BOZ (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Assassin Mountain

The article Assassin Mountain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This game accessory fails Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Merge to Al-Qadim maybe? Web Warlock (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I already redirect the other two PRODs listed above to Al-Qadim, and that's the obvious target for this as well. But I wonder if we could create a new list of Al-Qadim game modules or something like that as a new target for all of these. There is probably better coverage for the campaign setting as a whole as opposed to coverage of individual modules. —Torchiest _edits 16:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

That might not be a bad idea. I originally created these as placeholders because I knew that there were reviews (mostly in White Wolf magazine) out there that I would eventually get to ... I just didn't think that it would be this long.  ;) I can always add the reviews later when/if I get my hands on the mags. BOZ (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Good source for Dragonlance articles

I'm too tired to dig into this right now, but this looks like a great source for multiple articles: the novel, the artifacts list, maybe the characters list. See what you think. —Torchiest _edits 05:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, in fact I have used it in small ways in some of the character articles; I could take a better look at it tomorrow, but I'm about to go to bed myself. BOZ (talk) 06:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Reminder to self - I need to go back to Space Gamer 85, which has a sort of auto-biography for Dave Arneson. Don't let me forget - busy looking through old gaming mags for DL novel reviews.  ;) BOZ (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Mind MGMT

I'm hoping to get this article up to GA or better quality, and any help or suggestions you could give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Argento Surfer (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there! :) It looks like you requested a peer review, which is a step in the right direction. If you follow the suggestions of the reviewer, chances are that you will be pretty close to GA-quality or even there already. The GA reviewer might give you additional requirements, and most reviewers are reasonable enough that if you meet their expectations they will pass. BOZ (talk) 23:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Asgardian_appeal

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#BASC:_Asgardian_appeal. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting. SilkTork 00:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)