Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nyttend (talk | contribs) at 07:53, 31 January 2013 (→The correct use of talk pages: Blocked for ban violation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Prosimetrum". Thank you! EarwigBot  12:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tristan! Not meaning to be confrontational, but I'm concerned that our little dispute at Prosimetrum won't get anywhere until a volunteer assesses the Dispute Resolution request. I am given the impression that it takes longer (or may not even happen) if one of the opening comments is more than the requested 2,000 characters in length. Under these circumstances, your comment here is a bit long. You began by saying you would keep your comments to a minimum, but you are actually the only one of the four of us who exceeded the 2,000 characters. For future reference, it is the un-wikied text one types in, not the text that appears on the actual page, that is counted. elvenscout742 (talk) 01:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Just a note to alert you to the fact that discussion has now been opened at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Prosimetrum. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 19:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I've placed my comments at dispute resolution already and will wait for further discussion or queries from the volunteer referee or moderator before determining if it is useful to contribute more.Tristan noir (talk) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

WP:ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. elvenscout742 (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

The correct use of talk pages

Tristan noir, I have noticed that you have a habit of using article talk pages and WP:ANI, WP:AFD, AP:MFD, etc. in order to address my "behaviour" in general, and rarely address article content directly. If you have a problem with something I post on an article talk page, or on someone else's user talk page, or in my own user space, it's okay to post on my user talk page; in fact that is the only appropriate forum. It is very difficult for me to edit the broad range of articles I work on, when I have to be aware that at any time you may post your opposition to my edits on a completely different page. If you have a particular proposal for a particular article, please use the talk page of the article in question; if you have a problem with my behaviour in general, please use my talk page. elvenscout742 (talk) 06:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

This block is being levied for your violation of an interaction ban at Mokichi Saitō. Given your complaint to Drmies that Elvenscout was violating an interaction ban by editing this page, you were plainly aware that he had edited it, and your awareness that he had been blocked for the issue means that it's quite equitable for the same to be done in your case. As long as this ban is in place, you are required to heed your own words: be "careful to avoid any article previously edited by the other party". Nyttend (talk) 07:53, 31 January 2013 (UTC)