Misplaced Pages

User talk:RidjalA

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by UseTheCommandLine (talk | contribs) at 20:20, 15 February 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:20, 15 February 2013 by UseTheCommandLine (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Salutations,

Please leave comments or questions below this line. For past discussions, please check this page's history.

Suggestion regarding La Luz del Mundo content

RidjalA please state which specific current content in the article you are unhappy with (In a new section on the talk page). I know that you do not like the discrimination section because it goes against your POV that the Church is a massive financial institution that conspires with the Mexican Government and Mexican journalists to cause all sorts of mayhem. Perhaps we could open a discussion on the content in the Dispute Resolution? I believe that's the most civilized way, as opposed to accusing people and making personal attacks. You seemed content with my treatment of the history section, I don't see why that can't be replicated elsewhere.

Speaking of personal attacks, if you keep accusing me of being payed or otherwise compensated by any third party, or lumping me with Ajaxfiore, I am afraid that I will have to report you. I beleive that you have been warned before by other outside editors in the talk page and by myself on this issue multiple times. Fordx12 (talk) 01:57, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Fordx12, hope you're well. I've made it clear in the talk page that I feel the discrimination section needs an overhaul. One recent editor wikinuevo was pretty vocal about some of those edits, too. He stated that the data distorts the NPOV in such a manner that it makes it seem as though the church is being slanderously targeted. But that's beyond the scope of our discussion, perhaps we can move this discussion back into the talk page like you suggested.
I've been sharing my POV that I'm not convinced you guys have much interest in genuinely contributing to the improvement of the entirety of the article (you guys keep removing Erdely as a source, and anyone who knows about the church knows how much LLDM adherents and associates hate Erdely). I'm not saying that you and Ajaxfiore are terrible people, but you guys come off as instruments that the LLDM leadership is utilizing for improving their personal image: SJF already implements services from lawyers, television/media (Casa Cultural Berea), computer programmers, PR people, Incondicionales, and so many others to help improve and promote SJF's image after the turmoil from the scandals. I wouldn't doubt that someone was formally designated as a Wiki-editor as well by El Apostol de Dios. I'm suspicious about some of your guy's data too, and where you're getting that data from as only those associated with the 'Apostol of God' would have any vetted interest and have the proper channels of providing the obscure data that you guys are providing to debase Erdely.
BTW, have you noticed that the vandalization campaign against the article page has ceased for almost an entire year now? I wonder what made them call it off? I remember at one point we couldn't even go a week without the page being brutally vandalized.
Many blessings, RidjalA (talk) 05:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
I actually "sighed" when I read this. This wasn't an invitation for you to voice your conspiracy theories. I am sure this conspiracy is very real to you. You were told to drop this by other editors including administrators. Besides, you seem awfully defensive of Erdely when no one else seems to share this opinion of yours. Perhaps there's another conspiracy going on here? It's strange that Wikinuevo came out of no where and made edits that you'd agree with. Perhaps you're both related to Erdely somehow....You see how easy it is to accuse someone of being involved in a conspiracy? I think I'll prepare a DRN report and settle some of the content there. You'll be given the proper notice. Fordx12 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "La Luz del Mundo".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot  16:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

AN/I notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RidjalA.The discussion is about the topic La Luz del Mundo. Thank you. Ajaxfiore (talk) 04:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism tags

Please do not place vandalism tags on my talk page as you did here. Please read WP:VANDAL to understand wiki policies. Ajaxfiore (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your input would be appreciated at WP:DRN

Hi,

I am a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, helping to moderate a content dispute in which you may have been involved. There are open questions there that I think it would be useful to have your input on.

Thanks.

-- UseTheCommandLine (talk) 03:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, from a DR/N volunteer

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties and no further comment is made at the opened filing, it may be failed and suggested that the next logical course of action be formal mediation. Please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Failed". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)