This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alatari (talk | contribs) at 00:12, 25 March 2013 (→Charlie Jade 'cancelled': thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:12, 25 March 2013 by Alatari (talk | contribs) (→Charlie Jade 'cancelled': thanks)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Andreasmperu! I am E dog95 and have been editing Misplaced Pages for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Misplaced Pages! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! E_dog95' 04:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
User talk page
You are apparently unaware that editors are free to remove comments from their own talk page. In other words, stop mucking with my talk page. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 04:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
January 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ghansoli. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NJA (t/c) 08:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Questions from me
Andreasmperu you gave me a final warning on my talk page and told me to just talk to you. I don't know how to just talk to you in Misplaced Pages. May I ask you some questions here? Are you engaged in an edit war with me??? over the International Churches of Christ page??? Are you a member of the International Churches of Christ?? It looks like you hold some sort of job in Misplaced Pages? I did not know that you an employee of Misplaced Pages. Why are my edits to the International Churches of Christ page not acceptable?
TUSC token 4c09c9ec515144406767601c0acd199b
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Hola gran peruana
Hola Andreasmperu, sabes eres una gran peruana editora, redactora y culta, eres una gloriosa, maravillosa y candorosa peruana, y si no me equivoco creo que eres la peruana con mas ediciones en la historia de la Misplaced Pages! tienes como 35.084 ediciones ¡asuuu! ahora estas en puesto 56 del Ranking de ediciones de la Misplaced Pages en español. Saludos de corazon -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 03:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sigue asi!! edita siempre cada semana, ojala los peruanos Mansoncc, Mercenario97 y Axxgreazz no te pasen. Saludos cordiales -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 03:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Your signature
Hello there Andreasmperu, I happened to come across your signature and noticed you have an image in it. I should point out to you that in doing so violates the signatures guideline, as images in signatures are strictly not allowed. Could you please remove the image from your signature? Thank you. — ξ 04:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi - I've added the rollback flag for you per your request. Happy editing. Pedro : Chat 10:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Constantly reverting the ICOC wikipedia page back to an earlier version which makes the article sound like pro-ICOC propaganda
Misplaced Pages is not to be used as pro-ICOC propaganda. The ICOC Misplaced Pages page is not neutral; it's full of pro-ICOC and pro-ICC propaganda. I have included some reputable information and sources to make the page appear neutral. It would seem that you are an ICOC/ICC member who is trying to use the ICOC/ICC Misplaced Pages page as an evangelism tool. Stop it. Qewr4231 (talk) 23:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Request For Misplaced Pages Help
Every time that I make a legitimate edit using reputable sources, some of which are even ICOC/ICC in origin, to the International Churches of Christ page Andreasmperu erases them. Andreasmperu's version of the ICOC/ICC page is not neutral; it's pro-ICOC and pro-ICC. Shouldn't all the relevant facts about the ICOC/ICC be reported whether the facts are positive or negative? I am requesting Misplaced Pages's help.Qewr4231 (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Your recent speedy deletion requests.
I've declined several of your speedy deletion requests for school articles such as this one because A7 does not apply to schools. If you think that these schools are not notable then you should nominate them for deletion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter
The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter
The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Page moves
Hi Andreasmperu, I noticed that you moved this article a little while ago. If you move an article and it has any media in it like pictures or sound files, please be sure to check those files and update any fair use rationales on the pages. Changing the article name can break the FUR and someone may later come along and remove the file and then delete it. I went ahead and fixed this one for you. Any questions or trouble let me know on my talk page. Thanks!--Crossmr (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- No trouble, just wanted to let you know for the future.--Crossmr (talk) 22:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Hello Andreasmperu! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 02:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
Ricardo Letts Colmenares
I can't read Spanish, so I can't review the Spanish deletion discussion, but this version says that Ricardo Letts Colmenares was a member of the national legislature. That's not only a claim of significance enough to meet WP:CSD#A7, but probably enough (assuming it was verified) to automatically make the person notable. If the whole article is a hoax, then it could still be deleted, or if the info can't be verified, it could be deleted via AfD, but without more info, I cannot speedily delete it via A7. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:12, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
You've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 11:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Andreasmperu! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter
The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
- Your account activation code has been emailed to your Misplaced Pages email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
- If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 20:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)
Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Misplaced Pages editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Misplaced Pages editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:
- Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.
At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).
Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.
If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi 17:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Misplaced Pages email!
- Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
- Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
- Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Misplaced Pages will see it).
- You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Misplaced Pages).
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
- Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
- Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Slash dead?
I don't think you intended it, but you reverted vandalism with more vandalism. see here. Trackinfo (talk) 05:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Andreasmperu! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Misplaced Pages are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
RECAB
Hola Andrea, no me consta que efectivamente te hayan avisado por lo que te aviso nuevamente, pero en la wiki-es se te abrió una RECAB, saludos Hprmedina (talk) 20:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hola Andrea, creo que muchos lamentamos lo sucedido, pero seguramente serás bienvenida!!!!. Un saludo afectuoso. Sergio Andres Segovia (talk) 15:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
My best wishes for you! Hugs! :) Nixón (wop!) 02:39, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
RE: Homaloptera maxinae
Sorry about that, I redirected H. maxinae as it is now considered to be a jr. synonym of Homalopteroides smithi (formerly Homalopterus smithi) as per Kottelat's revision of the loaches. This is a rather massive revision as so there have been a few times that I have forgotten to give the reason for the change. Thank you for calling it to my attention.Divingpetrel (talk) 04:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- A move would not work in this case as a page for Homalopterus smithi already existed and has been moved to Homalopteroides smithi. Again thanks for the feedbackDivingpetrel (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
businessperson
"Business person" is another variation of businessperson just like the others. you must not revert it again, or i will send my level 69 Azumarill after you, no i won't. but i ask that you leave it alone, ok? 199.101.61.190 (talk) 05:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Now i may not be able to send darkrai after you but if i see my edit to business person reverted, i will force you to go 3 rounds on The Roller Coaster, ok? 199.101.61.190 (talk) 07:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
¿Que pasó?
Hola Andrea soy Bambadee de la wikipedia en español. Desde el 5 de nov de 2012 no editas ¿porqué?.--190.33.67.43 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks much for your category help at Freedom for the Thought That We Hate
Thanks much for your category help at Freedom for the Thought That We Hate. Much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 07:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Indonesia fairy tales
Folklore and fiction are mutually discrete forms of literature - I fail to see how you can join them, any clues why? thanks SatuSuro 04:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, maybe you are confusing subcategories with intersections. While there are some similarities between categories and sets, categories are rather organized as trees. Having said that, all subcategories contained in Category:Fairy tales by country were in turn categorized as "Category:Country literature" and "Category:Country folklore". Since "literature" is a broad category, I chose to specify what kind of literature ("fiction" or better "fantasy"). Andreasm 16:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Mr Bennet and Bennet family
Hi Andreasmperu, and first of all, thanks for your ongoing translation of Bennet family from the French article. Second, I wanted to ask you about Mr Bennet and whether it has any content that could be valuable to the family article in its current state. It reads like a literature essay right now, citing only P&P itself and one critical work. I had thought to merge or redirect it to Bennet family; when I saw that you were in the process of bringing French content over, I thought I'd ask whether it would be sensible to just redirect it now. I don't know French, but it looks like their existing content on Mr Bennet in the family article is better than what we have in the standalone article. Did I make that confusing enough? --BDD (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Once I started translating fr:Famille Bennet, I found myself on the opposite dilemma: I thought the article was too long, so it could be divided into small articles for each character. I gave up on this option because the main article had a good cohesion that was to be broken. So, I agree with your choice, given that the section concerning Mr Bennet is much better than the article itself. It is therefore necessary to complete the translation. Since my mother tongue is not English, I will be more than grateful if you could help me with some proofreading (correction of grammatical or typographical errors), in order to accelerate the process. Andreasm 04:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- We may make a good team, then. I'd be happy to copy edit for you after your translation. --BDD (talk) 06:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Re:
I will be careful,thanks by the advice :) Carliitaeliza TALK 01:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit Warring
You are not doing anything better in reverting the other editor on Category:German novels. It is no better that you revert to a normal version if you yourself engage in potentially warring behavior. Please use the talk page for discussion, and WP:ANI for anything that escalates. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Novel categories
Hi, do you want to continue the discussion at Category talk:French novels? Or can I change the categories without being reverted? Smetanahue (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- You cannot do whatever you want. There is an ongoing discussion (precisely to wait for comments from other editors). Moreover, you have not answered the objections raised in RFC by the other editor. Andreasm 17:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
RE: Year 0 - I believe my alterations to this article should not have been reversed by you as the citations have already been aluded to in the text or already present. There is considerable dispute over the facts and article should reflect this. The 2 citations are here - 1.) http://www.socialismtoday.org/44/millennium.html (This was already listed in the article by someone else and is visible when editing the page) 2.) http://en.wikipedia.org/0s (This was already aluded to in the text when I said that what was previously claimed contradicted every other wikipedia article on decades since the year 1AD - There are at least 200 other Misplaced Pages articles which also contradict it, for each of the 200 or so decades since this point. Would you like me to list all 200 of them? If not, please restore the alterations you removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.68.155 (talk) 19:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Categories
Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_February_7#Ethnic_categories_related_to_Vojvodina 80.232.234.114 (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Other user already deleted that category from most articles. There is no need that category remains only in few articles. Would you revert that other user too: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Stepanovi%C4%87evo&diff=537226782&oldid=531983045 80.232.234.114 (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Universidades
Hola Andreasmperu! La referencia especifica debio ser esta , en la que no es considerada la misma amplitude instituciones, y que define "Iberoamerican Higher Education Insitutions". En tal caso si es aplicable la referencia y su consideracion como clasificacion academica. Saludos cordials.--Kanon6996 (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hola Andreasmperu! En relacion a tu comentario te dejo 2 puntos que no has considerado: 1) El hecho de criticar el punto de evaluacion de un ranking como el de SCimago, implicaria tambien criticar el ranking 4ICU (que es un ranking netamente de presencia web. En lineas generales todas las clasificaciones incluidas ponderan grados a universidades, y pueden considerarse como mediciones objetivas, siendo obviamente ninguna definitive. 2) Al revertir no has considerado la existencia de ediciones de cada ranking, el uso de una referencia como el Diario La Republica es justamente en razon de corroborar los datos de version del ranking web de Webometrics de 2011. En tal sentido ninguna referencia es duplicada, debiendo considerarse que tal como existen diferentes clasificaciones academicas, tambien existen diversas ediciones (anuales) de estas. Saludos cordiales--Kanon6996 (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hola Andreasmperu! Justamente el error de empezar a debatir sobre que ranking es adecuado y cual no ya hace a uno caer en subjetividad. Ninguno pondra content a todos porque todos tienen distintas metodologias: presencia web, investigacion, impacto web, papers publicados, etc. Algunos se enfocan mas en uno, otros consideran un poco de todos. Lo mas adecuado para no formar un sesgo de informacion es referenciar todos los que son accesibles o en todo caso ninguno. Saludos cordials.--Kanon6996 (talk) 01:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hola Andreasmperu! Con tu permiso continuare escribiendo en espanol, porque me resulta mas sencillo expresarme y porque no veo ningun impedimiento en hacerlo, gracias. En ningun momento dije que tu fueras subjetiva, sino te mencione que la valoracion personal de unos rankings sobre otros es propia de cada uno y ello ya va dentro de la subjetividad personal de cada uno. Lo objetivo en tal sentido como te mencione es la correcta inclusion de todos, porque como te mencione empezar a descartar alguno por una u otra razon, hace que tambien sea possible descartar otros como el de Webometrics, etc. Agradecere no hagas comentarios hacia mi persona que indiquen que no contribuyo. Llevo un buen tiempo contribuyendo en Misplaced Pages en redaccion de articulos y tambien vigilando ediciones, en este caso lo que te indico es mi postura, esperando en todo caso pueda encontrarse una postura media en la que ambos estemos de acuerdo. Saludos cordials :)--Kanon6996 (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Es lo mas recommendable pero no obligatorio, en todo caso dado que el asunto tambien implica a los articulos de la Misplaced Pages ES, y la facilidad para ambos de comunicarnos alli, continuare con mi respuesta en la wikipeida ES. Gracias por la comprension.--Kanon6996 (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Works by writer
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
– Fayenatic London 18:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Bennet family
Hello ! Je viens juste de découvrir le démarrage de votre traduction. C'est vrai, en français on présente souvent aux labels BA et AdQ des articles beaucoup plus longs et plus fouillés qu'en anglais. Nous avons, Azurfrog et moi-même, pris beaucoup beaucoup de plaisir à faire tous ces articles sur et autour de Jane Austen ! Désolée, je n'ai pas de talk page sur en.wiki. EYMERY.
Charlie Jade 'cancelled'
No where in the entire article is the actual word 'cancel' used. It is the term people scan the article for when trying to make a decision to start a series on Hulu or Netflix. They also want to know if there is a cliff hanger ending or some resolution before investing time in watching the show. 97.85.168.22 (talk) 08:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
You are going to edit war over adding two truthful adjectives to the opening sentence of the article? That's ridiculous. The show is from 2004 and there is no second season coming. 97.85.168.22 (talk) 20:19, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Just because I'm not signed in and am using an IP edit does NOT mean I'm not an established editor. Stop your edit warring about a simple descriptive adjectives giving a concise view of the state of the show. "What (or who) is the subject?" = A cancelled, single season science fiction television series. Short, sweet and concise. Please review the Misplaced Pages:Lead section TT first sentence content and please stop abusing the anonymous editors. Alatari (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, the complete guideline is WP:MOSBEGIN. For some examples regarding the first sentence of an article, you can check on Misplaced Pages:MOSBEGIN#Proper names and titles, where it clearly states this order: is a . If you think the information is really important, the rest of the introduction section is the right place to put it. Andreasm 00:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thankyou, I can always learn something new. Alatari (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)