This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) at 00:16, 3 April 2013 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Nag Champa. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:16, 3 April 2013 by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Nag Champa. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please note that I do not respond to uncivilized threats from other editors or admins... =//= Johnny Squeaky 00:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
Your recent editing history at Nag Champa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)