Misplaced Pages

Mens rea

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Imadork (talk | contribs) at 01:34, 31 December 2002. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:34, 31 December 2002 by Imadork (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Mens rea or "bad mind" is the mental state that, in combination with the actus reus or "bad act," produces criminal liability. There must be a simultaneous occurence of both bad mind and bad act for criminal liability to exist. However, mens rea does not necessarily mean that the actor "intended" to commit the forbidden act.

The Model Penal Code, a publication of the American Law Institute, defines mens rea in particularly clear terms and has been adopted by much of the United States:

  • Purpose: the actor's conscious object is to commit the proscribed act.
  • Knowledge: the actor knows that the proscribed act will certainly occur as a result of his actions.
  • Recklessness: the actor is aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the proscribed act will occur as a result of his actions.
  • Negligence: the actor reasonably should know that the proscribed act will occur as a result of his actions.

Contrast these four categories with the Common Law mens rea definitions:

  • Specific Intent: the actor intends to commit the proscribed act. E.g. premeditated murder. Roughly equivalent to the Purpose and Knowledge standards of the Model Penal Code.
  • General Intent: the actor intends a bad act, but not necessarily the act that is subsequently committed. Roughly equivalent to the Recklessness and Negligence standards of the Model Penal Code.
  • Strict Liability: the actor has no intent to commit any offense but is held liable nonetheless. The Model Penal Code does not recognize strict liability as a mens rea for which imprisonment is appropriate.

A concept that is somewhat misleading for its over-simplification is so-called presumed knowledge of the law. A more appropriate saying is that generally, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. No one is "presumed" to know the law; the reality is that knowledge of the particular statute prohibiting certain conduct is not usually an element of the crime created by that statute, and therefore knowledge of the law is not required for punishment.

Examples of mens rea in statutes

Model Penal Code: A person commits murder if he (1) purposely or knowingly (2) causes the death of a human being.

Common Law: (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to cause the death of a human being with malice aforethought. (b) A violation of this section is murder in the second degree.

See also: actus reus, murder, manslaughter, animus nocendi, voluntas necandi

See generally: Criminal law