This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cailil (talk | contribs) at 00:43, 21 April 2013 (-1: Patriarchy is mentioned in the first section (after the lede) teh subsection on Patriarchy can be moved up if needs be). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:43, 21 April 2013 by Cailil (talk | contribs) (-1: Patriarchy is mentioned in the first section (after the lede) teh subsection on Patriarchy can be moved up if needs be)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- Improve article to featured standards
- Harmonize citation style (using {{cite}}) and making sure all relevant page numbers are included.
- 33 citation needs page numbers
- Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
- The "Pornography" section is a bit unclear. Could you spell out in a few sentences what exactly the debate was/is? The "Prostitution" section does that very well.
- The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based.