Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 64.107.183.186 (talk) at 16:42, 14 May 2013 (Reverted POV version by Slimvirgin, restored NPOV version by User Otto Placik.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Labiaplasty (also labioplasty) is a plastic surgery procedure for altering the labia minora and the labia majora, which are the paired tissue-structures bounding the vestibule of the vulva. The indications for the correction of labial hypertrophy are two-fold: (i) the correction of defect and deformity, and (ii) the cosmetic refinement of the pudendum femininum.

Despite there being no formal medical definition of labia minora hypertrophy (excess length, width, girth), labiaplasty corrects the clinical conditions wherein a woman presents labia minora that are disproportionately greater than her labia majora; the labioplastic correction of the labial disproportions creates less asymmetrical labia minora, which are functionally and aesthetically satisfactory to the woman.

Labiaplasty corrections include clinical presentations of congenital defects and congenital abnormalities, such as vaginal atresia (absent vaginal passage), Müllerian agenesis (malformed uterus and fallopian tubes), intersex conditions (male and female sexual characteristics in a person), etc.; and the exterior cosmetic refinement of the vulvo-vaginal complex, to repair the tearing and stretching of the labia minora caused by the mechanical stresses of childbirth, accident, and age. Furthermore, in other surgical practice, within a male-to-female sexual reassignment vaginoplasty operation for the creation of a neovagina, a labiaplasty procedure creates labia where once there were none.

Surgical anatomy of the vulva

The vulvo-vaginal complex

The external genitalia of a woman form the vulvo-vaginal complex, which comprises the labia majora, the labia minora, the clitoris, the urethra, and the vagina. The fatty labia majora (the large outer lips) extend from the mons pubis to the rectum. The vascularized labia minora (the small inner lips) are within the labia majora; however, in some women, the minor lips are short and thin and hidden by the labia majora; and in some women, the labia minora are longer, thicker, and wider, and extend beyond the labia majora.

Composition

The labia minora consist of two (2) connective folds of flesh that contain some adipose tissue; at the front and upper portions of the pudendum femininum (vulva), the labia minora divide into two parts. The first part passes over the clitoris, and forms the prepuce of the clitoris (clitoral hood); the second part of the labia minora joins beneath the clitoris and forms the fourchette (labial frenulum), a transverse fold of tissue that occasionally unites the labia minora to the labia majora at their posterior extensions. The skin and the mucosa of the labia minora are rich in sebaceous glands and nerve endings, the labia thus are very sensitive to the touch. These folds of vulvo-vaginal skin have a core of connective, erectile tissue (analogous to the corpus spongiosum of the penis), and are covered by stratified, squamous epithelium — thus, during sexual arousal, the labia minora moisten and swell with extracellular fluid. Furthermore, during urination, the labia minora function to direct the urine stream away from the vulva (pudendum femininum).

Labial anatomic variation

The size, the shape, and the skin coloration of the labia minora vary according to the woman, thus, like most paired structures of the human body, the labia are not anatomically symmetrical — one labium minus (minor lip) usually is greater (longer, wider, thicker) than its pair — yet the asymmetry usually is not notable. Moreover, the length and the width of the labia minora determine if they protrude from, or are hidden by, the labia majora. Further increases in the sizes of the labia (majora and minora) occur when the woman is sexually aroused — in preparation for sexual intercourse — when the labia become engorged with blood, and so the labial diameters increase two-to-three times the (unaroused) original labial size.

In the course of a woman’s life, her labia minora can become hypertrophied (oversized) by the mechanical stresses (stretching and tearing) occurred during sexual intercourse, masturbation, childbirth, lymphatic congestion (stasis), chronic dermatitis, and the inflammation caused by urinary incontinence. Labial hypertrophy can also be caused by the mechanical stresses inherent to the cultural practice of genital piercing, in which case the labia or labium bears (relatively) heavy-weight metal ornaments, which have been attached perforating either labium or the labia, in which case, the genital piercing is medically notable because bearing weight is not a usual anatomic function of the labia minora. Furthermore, oversized labia minora can also be a genetically inherited anatomical feature of the woman’s vulva. The plastic surgery study Labiaplasty and Labia minora Reduction (2008) reported the occurrence of labia minora of like sizes (length, width, girth) in identical twin sisters treated for labial hypertrophy, which might indicate a genetic predisposition to developing oversized labia minora.

Measures of the vulva

Because there is no formal, medical definition of labial hypertrophy (excess length, width, girth), nor a standardized method for grading the degree of hypertrophy present, the plastic surgeon and the woman (patient) determine the applicability of labial reduction to her labia without a fixed anatomic reference, based upon the patient’s ideal image of her body. To the end of providing such a medical and anatomic reference, the morphologic study Female Genital Appearance: ‘Normality’ Unfolds (2005) reported the range of anatomic variations of the vulvo-vaginal complex of a 50-woman cohort (18–50 y/o, mean age 35.6 yrs.); the reported statistical variations of the vulva are:

External image
“Betty Dodson’s Vulva Illustrations” show the varied labial morphology (appearance) of the vulvo-vaginal complex.

Labial hypertrophy

Etiology

The causes of labial hypertrophy, the overdevelopment of the labia minora, are etiologically varied, and can derive from factors such as the woman having been born with oversized labia (genetic inheritance); or having been caused by the mechanical stresses (stretching, pulling, and tearing) characteristic to coitus (sexual intercourse), masturbation, childbirth, urinary incontinence, lymphatic congestion (stasis), chronic dermatitis, granulomatous disease, myelodysplastic disease, and by the topical and systematic application of hormones. In some women, vaginal childbirth causes the development of labial hypertrophy when a hematoma occurs during the parturition. Moreover, the cultural practice of genital piercing can cause labial hypertrophy and labial asymmetry, because of the heavy weight of the metal ornaments inserted to the labium or to the labia for their decoration. Furthermore, the report Labiaplasty and Labia minora Reduction (2008), indicated the occurrence of labia minora of the same size in identical-twin women treated for labial hypertrophy, which occurrence indicated a possible genetic determination of the size of the labia minora.

Clinical definition

Therapeutically, because there is no formal medical definition of labial hypertrophy, nor a standardized method for grading the degree of hypertrophy present in the labia minora of the woman (patient), the plastic surgeon gives especial consideration to the anatomic particulars of the vulvo-vaginal complex of the woman. Likewise, the surgeon must give especial consideration to the wide variance among women’s perceptions of the ideal genital body image — what the woman (patient) considers and does not consider to be an aesthetically normal and proportionate vulva. (See: Body dysmorphic disorder and Body image)

Pathophysiology

• The dimensions of oversized labia minora are established by:

1. horizontally measuring the size of each labium minus, from the midline.
2. vertically measuring the size of each labium minus, between the base and the free-edge of the labium.
3. applying a 3–5 cm range of measure as “hypertrophy” of the labia minora.

• The degree of labial hypertrophy is characterized as:

1. No hypertrophy — the labia minora are concealed within, or extend to, the free edge of the labia majora.
2. Mild-to-moderate hypertrophy — the labia minora extend approximately 1–3 cm beyond the free edge of the labia majora.
3. Severe hypertrophy — The labia minora extend an approximate distance >3.0 cm beyond the free edge of the labia majora.

Presentation

Physically, the woman seeking the surgical reduction of her oversized labia minora often presents labial asymmetry that causes her awkward vulvo-vaginal hygiene (e.g. toilet-paper bits attaching to the labia); the catching of the labia in garment-zipper closures; pubic discomfort when wearing tight clothes; pubic-area pain when practicing sport (bicycling, running, etc.); either a disrupted or a diffused urinary stream; and dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse). In the case of labial asymmetry, wherein one labium minus (inner lip) is longer, wider, and thicker than the corresponding labium minus, only the oversized inner lip is surgically reduced in order to match the smaller labium minus. Labioplasty can be safely performed any time after sexual maturity (to a woman who is minimally 18 years of age); it can be performed either before or after pregnancy, in order to minimze hormonal interference with her body’s capacity to heal a surgical wound. Yet, labioplasty is not performed upon a woman who is menstruating, lest she risk post-operative infection of the surgical-incision site(s). Generally, the woman’s most common complaint of self perception is that, when observed in the standing position, her labia minora protrude too much beyond the labia majora, which is a physical condition that often leads to low self esteem, and subsequent difficulty in achieving emotional and sexual intimacy in her private life. (See: Sex appeal and Body dysmorphic disorder)

The patient

Indications

I. Oversized labia

The woman afflicted with labial hypertrophy presents labia minora that are disproportionately oversized in relation to the size of the labia majora, which, to her, the patient, have an aesthetically displeasing appearance, and cause her problematic hygiene, which is commonly reported either as a diffused or as a disrupted urinary stream; chronic irritation of the pudendal skin; painful sexual intercourse; and pubic pain when wearing tight clothes. Anatomically, like all the paired structures of the human body, it is uncommon for the labia minora to be perfectly symmetrical. Usually, the size discrepancy is slight, yet some women present one labium minus (minor lip) considerably larger (longer, wider, thicker) than its pair minor-lip; and some women also present redundant folding (either unilateral or bilateral webbing) between the labia majora and the labia minora that can be surgically resolved.

Therapy

• Medical — Labial hypertrophy, the overdevelopment of the vaginal lips, is not managed medically.

• Surgical — The woman’s specific clinical indications, of oversized labia minora, determine the appropriate labiaplasty technique. The correction of hypertrophied labia minora can be performed upon a patient either as a discrete labiaplasty (single surgery procedure), or in conjunction with a gynecologic surgery procedure, or in conjunction with a cosmetic surgery procedure (genitoplasty).

Contraindications

• Absolute — There are no absolute contraindications to labioplastic surgery, either for altering or for reducing the labia minora or the labia majora.

• Relative — Labial reduction surgery is relatively contraindicated for the woman who has an active gynecological disease (e.g. an infection or a neoplastic malignancy); for the woman who is a tobacco smoker unwilling to quit (either temporarily or permanently) in order to optimize the capability of her body to heal a surgical-incision wound; and for the woman who holds unrealistic aesthetic goals (ideal self-image and body image), and expectations for the outcome. Such a woman (patient) should either be psychologically counselled or excluded from labioplastic surgery.

II. Sexual reassignment

In sexual reassignment surgery, in the case of the male-to-female transgender patient, labiaplasty usually is the second stage of a two-stage vaginoplasty operation, wherein labiaplastic techniques are applied to create labia minora and a clitoral hood. In a male-to-female procedure, the labiaplasty usually is performed months after the first-stage of the vaginoplasty. As required by the (transgender) woman’s indications, after a one-stage vaginoplasty, the labiaplasty — which creates the labia majora and the labia minora — can be performed as an elective surgery procedure for refining the aesthetics of the woman’s vulvo-vaginal complex. (See: Male-to-female sex reassignment surgery)

Surgical procedures

General

As with every paired structure of the human body, the labia minora are not perfectly symmetrical, and, although the size discrepancy usually is subtle, women often present one labium minus (minor lip) considerably greater (longer, wider, thicker) than its pair; thus, only the over-sized lip undergoes tissue resection (cutting and removal). In the woman who presents greatly oversized labia minora, wherein one labium is considerably larger than its pair, only the oversized lip is resected for symmetry with the smaller lip. In the case of the woman who also presents redundant folding — unilateral webbing or bilateral webbing — between the labia majora and the labia minora, said condition of excess tissues can also be resolved by means of labioplasty.

In corrective praxis, the labial reduction can be performed upon a patient under local anaesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anaesthesia, either as a discrete, single surgery, or in conjunction with a gynecologic surgery procedure, or with a cosmetic surgery procedure. The resection proper is facilitated with the administration of an anaesthetic solution (lidocaine and epinephrine in saline solution) that is infiltrated to the labia minora in order to achieve the tumescence (swelling) of the tissues and the constriction of the pertinent labial circulatory system, which are the conditions of hemostasis that limit bleeding.

Techniques for labial reduction

I. Edge resection technique

The original labiaplasty technique was the simple resection of the excess tissues at the free edge of the labia minora. One variant resection-technique features a clamp placed across the area of labial tissue that is to be resected, in order to establish hemostatis (stopped blood-flow); the surgeon the resects the excess labial tissues, and then sutures the cut labium minus. The technical disadvantages of the labial-edge resection technique are the loss of the natural rugosity (wrinkles) of the labia minora free edges, thus, aesthetically, it produces an unnaturally “perfect appearance” to the vulva, and also presents a greater risk of damaging the nerve endings of the labial edge. There also exists the possibility of everting (turning outwards) the inner lining of the labia, which then makes visible the normally hidden internal, pink labial tissues. The advantages of edge-resection include the precise control of all of the hyper-pigmented (darkened) irregular labial edges (which the woman-patient reported as either functionally or aesthetically undesirable to her) with a linear scar that can also be used to contour the redundant (excess) tissues of the clitoral hood, when such are present.

II. Central wedge resection technique

Labial reduction performed by means of a central-wedge-resection involves cutting and removing a full-thickness wedge of tissue from the thickest portion of the labium minus. Unlike the edge-resection technique, the resection pattern of the central wedge technique preserves the natural rugosity (wrinkled free-edge) of the labia minora. Yet, because it is a full-thickness resection, there exists the potential risk of damaging the pertinent labial nerves, which can result in painful neuromas, and numbness. F. Giraldo et al. procedurally refined the central-wedge-resection technique with an additional 90-degree Z-plasty technique, which produces a refined surgical scar that is less tethered, and so diminishes the physical tensions exerted upon the surgical-incision wound, and, therefore, reduces the likelihood of a notched (scalloped-edge) scar. The central wedge-resection technique is a demanding surgical procedure, and the technical difficulty can arise when having to determine the correct amount of labial skin to resect, which might result in either the under-correction (persistent tissue-redundancy), or the over-correction (excessive tension to the surgical wound), and an increased probability of wound dehiscence, the separation of the edges of the surgical-wound. Moreover, as appropriate, a separate incision is required to treat a prominent clitoral hood.

III. De-epithelialization technique

Labial reduction by means of the de-epithelialization of the tissues involves cutting the epithelium of a central area on the middle and side aspects of each labium minor (small lip), either with a scalpel or with a medical laser. This labiaplasty technique reduces the vertical excess tissue, while preserving the natural rugosity (corrugated free-edge) of the labia minora, and thus preserves the sensory and erectile characteristics of the labia. Yet, the technical disadvantage of labiaplasty by de-epithelialization is that the width of the individual inner labium might increase if a large area of labial tissue must be de-epithelialized to achieve the reduction of the given labium minus.

IV. Labiaplasty with clitoral unhooding

A labial reduction procedure occasionally includes the resection (cutting and removing) of the clitoral prepuce (clitoral hood) when the thickness of its skin interferes with the woman’s sexual response. The surgical un-hooding of the clitoris involves a V–to–Y advancement of the soft tissues, which is achieved by suturing the clitoral hood to the pubic bone in the midline (to avoid the pudendal nerves); thus, uncovering the clitoris further tightens the labia minora.

V. Laser labiaplasty technique

Labial reduction by means of laser-ray resection of the hypertrophied labia minora involves the de-epithelialization of the labia. The technical disadvantage of laser labiaplasty is that the removal of excess labial epidermis risks causing the occurrence of epidermal inclusion cysts.

Surgical technique

Labiaplasty by de-epithelialization

Labial reduction by de-epithelialization cuts and removes the excess tissues and preserves the natural rugosity (wrinkled free-edge) of the labia minora, and so preserves the capabilities for tumescence and sensation, because the technique avoids the labial corpus spongiosum and the pudendal nerve. Yet, when the woman (patient) presents much excess labial tissue, a combination procedure of de-epithelialization and clamp-resection usually is more effective for achieving the aesthetic outcome established by the patient and her plastic surgeon, before the operation. In the case of a woman with labial webbing (redundant folding) between the labia minora and the labia majora, the de-epithelialization labiaplasty includes an additional resection technique — such as the five-flap Z-plasty (“jumping man plasty”) — to establish a regular and symmetric shape for the reduced labia minora.

Pre-operative matters

• Consultation — To understand the patient’s aesthetic goals for her self image, the plastic surgeon examines the woman when she is tanding, in order to evaluate the degree of labial hypertrophy present in the woman’s vulvo-vaginal complex. Afterwards, in the operating room, with the patient in the lithotomy position (as if for a urinary-bladder stone-removal surgery), the surgeon then delineates the resection-pattern markings (the incision plan) to each side of each labium (lip) and so facilitate the de-epithelialization required for reducing its size (length and width). Afterwards an anaesthetic solution is infiltrated to the labial tissues to numb and swell the labia minora for easy resection of the excess tissues. As required by the patient’s health, the physician–surgeon might instruct the woman to take oral antibiotic and anti-inflammatory medications before the operation; if not feasible, the medications are intravenously administered to the patient at the start of the labiaplasty procedure.

Operative technique

For the optimal exposure of the vulvo-vaginal complex, the woman is positioned upon the operating table in the lithotomy position. After confirming regional anaesthesia and labial tumescence, the plastic surgeon then cuts and removes (resects) the excess tissues of the labia minora. After the resection step, the suturing of the surgical wound is the procedural step that most influences the aesthetic outcome of the labial reduction — suturing the tissues of the labia minora with a running, absorbable-suture occasionally produces a scalloped-edge surgical scar-line, whereas suturing the tissues with a running, buried-suture usually produces a wound closure (scar-line) of natural appearance.

Post-operative matters

• Convalescence — Post-operative pain and surgical-wound care are minimal, which conditions permit the woman to leave hospital and return home the same day she underwent the labial reduction procedure; usually, no vaginal packing is required, although she might choose to wear a sanitary pad for comfort. The physician informs the woman that the reduced labia often are very swollen during the early post-operative period, because of the edema caused by the anaesthetic solution injected to swell the labial tissues. She also is instructed on the proper cleansing of the surgical-wound site, and the application of a topical antibiotic ointment to the reduced labia; a post-operative wound-care regimen observed 3-times daily for 2-days after the labiaplasty procedure.

• Follow-up therapy — The woman’s initial, post–labiaplasty consultation with the plastic surgeon is recommended at 1-week post-operative. She is advised to return to the surgeon’s consultation room should she develop hematoma, an accumulation of blood outside the pertinent (venous and arterial) vascular system of the labia minora. In accordance with her wound-healing progress, the woman can resume physically un-strenuous and un-demanding work at 3–4 days post-operative. Moreover, to allow the full and proper healing of the labiaplasty surgical wounds, the woman is instructed to not use tampons, to not wear tight clothes (e.g. thong underwear), and to abstain from sexual intercourse for 4-weeks after the labial reduction surgery.

Complications

Medical complications to a labiaplasty procedure are uncommon; yet the occasional complications — bleeding, infection, labial asymmetry, poor wound-healing, under-correction, over-correction — do occur, and might require a surgical revision of the given medical complication. An over-aggressive resection (cutting and removing of labial tissues) might damage the nerves, which condition subsequently causes painful neuromas. Furthermore, performing a flap-technique labiaplasty occasionally presents a greater risk for tissue necrosis of the labia minora.

Criticism

Psychosocial criticism

Patients

There are two categories of women who seek vaginoplastic surgery: (i) Women who are physically afflicted with congenital defects, deformities, and abnormalities, such as vaginal atresia (absent vaginal passage), Müllerian agenesis (malformed uterus and fallopian tubes), intersex conditions (male and female sexual characteristics in a person), et cetera.; and (ii) Women who seek genital cosmetic surgery to enhance the beauty of their vulvo-vaginal complexes. Therefore, a woman usually seeks a labial reduction procedure to correct the morphologic changes caused by the mechanical stresses (stretching, pulling, tearing) of childbirth, sexual intercourse, accident, and aging. The symptoms of labial hypertrophy are vulvo-vaginal hygiene problems, chronic irritation of the pudendal skin, painful sexual intercourse (dyspareunia), and pubic pain when wearing tight clothes.

Patient psychology

The psychosocial study of women who pursue beauty by means of cosmetic plastic surgery, Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Treatment Manual (2010) indicates that, in addition to labial reduction, some women pursue genital surgery to acquire a flat vulvo-vaginal complex, in the style of the “prepubescent aesthetic” portrayed in commercial adverts and in pornography. Nonetheless, the investigators David Veale and Fugen Neziroglu, reported that “no studies have been done on the prevalence of BDD in women seeking labiaplasty. In this regard, it may be important for cosmetic gynecologists to define when the degree of protrusion, or hypertrophy, of the labia minora is no longer a minor defect (which would exclude a diagnosis of BDD). One of the authors , has seen several women seeking labiaplasty in recent years, because of her affiliation with gynecologists. Most of the women had either bulkiness or a slight protrusion of their labia , but were not abnormal in size. Because it is not appropriate for mental health professionals to assess the size and shape of the labia of women, a clinician must rely on a gynecologist or a family doctor who has examined the patient.” The body dysmorphia findings reported in the Veale–Neziroglu study confirm the psychosocial findings of the earlier study Female Genital Appearance: ‘Normality’ Unfolds (2005), which indicated that a woman — as a plastic surgery patient — might be motivated to seek labiaplasty (genitoplasty) because she feels that her vulva is not within a given “normal” aesthetic range of labial size, appearance, and color.

Patient satisfaction

The retrospective study Labiaplasty of the Labia minora: Patients’ Indications for Pursuing Surgery (2008) reported that in a cohort of 131 women, 32 per cent of the women underwent labial reduction to correct a functional impairment; 31 per cent underwent a two-fold labioplastic correction, for functional and aesthetic reasons; and 37 per cent underwent labiaplasty solely for aesthetic correction. Concerning the technical and procedural efficacy of labiaplasty, the study Hypertrophy of Labia minora: Experience with 163 Reductions (1999) reported a 93 per cent rate of patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome of the labial-reduction procedure, and concluded that labiaplasty is a technically simple surgical operation with a high rate of patient satisfaction.

Cultural criticism

I. Semantic distinctions

In Western culture, the term Female Genital Cutting (FGC) denotes the cutting off of any part(s) or portion(s) of the vulva — either for religious or for cultural reasons, or both — but does not denote the plastic surgery correction of the congenital defects and the developmental abnormalities of the vulvo-vaginal complex — such as vaginal atresia (undeveloped vagina), Müllerian agenesis (absent uterus and fallopian tubes), and intersex conditions. Yet, in social and cultural discourse, the layman opponents of such religiously- and culturally-motivated sexual mutilations inaccurately use the terms Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and Female Circumcision (FC) as interchangeably synonymous with female genital cutting. Therefore, from the physician’s perspective, it is important to formally observe the semantic distinctions among a religious practice, a cultural practice, and the medical practice of labiaplasty, which is an elective, plastic-surgery operation for a woman who requires the correction either of a functional or of a cosmetic problem of her vulva. The study Hypertrophy of Labia minora: Experience with 163 Reductions (1999) reported a 93 per cent rate of patient satisfaction with the labiaplasty outcomes; and the subsequent psychological improvements reported by the women included increased self-esteem derived from the refined aesthetic body image. The study Labiaplasty of the Labia minora: Patients’ Indications for Pursuing Surgery (2008), reported that 32 per cent of the women underwent labial reduction for the correction of a functional impairment; that 31 per cent of the women underwent the correction of functional and aesthetic impairments; and that 37 per cent of the women underwent labiaplasty solely for aesthetic corrections.

II. Woman as plastic surgery patient

Sociologically, labiaplasty is a controversial subject among laymen and physicians who believe that a woman’s decision to undergo cosmetic genital surgery is psychologically induced by the commercialism of medicalized sex appeal; and so, she desires a mentally unhealthy sexual body image derived from commercial advertising and from pornography — hence, some opponents of cosmetic plastic surgery semantically liken labiaplasty to genital modification and mutilation. Specifically regarding female genital mutilation, the World Health Organization (WHO) cited the Hippocratic Oath to publicly declare and establish the medical and ethical obligation that “health professionals must never perform female genital mutilation”, and so harm a woman patient.

• In the Feminist Studies journal essay “Loose Lips Sink Ships” (2002) and in the Shameless online magazine article “Making the Cut” (2005), Prof. Simone Weil Davis said that plastic surgeons perpetuate to women the cultural concept of aesthetically ideal female genitalia, and that, because the “labia are neither inside nor outside , they are ‘gateway tissues’, and they kind of represent a part that is confusing”; and said that, because women know only their vaginas and the pornographic pre-pubescent ideal, women readily doubt themselves, as aesthetically abnormal, as being outside the ideal beauty range, which is a cultural construct.

In addressing the matters of FGM (labial- and clitoral-mutilation as religious and cultural practices), which are illegal in Canada and the U.S., Prof. Davis addressed the semantic dilemma that arises “when you really look carefully at the language used in some of those laws, they would also make illegal the labiaplasties that are being done by plastic surgeons in the U.S.”

Nonetheless, although the official WHO resolution Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation (2008) defined FGM as “all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons”, the document’s Annex 2: Note on the Classification of Female Genital Mutilation formally states that: “The guiding principles for considering genital practices as female genital mutilation should be those of human rights, including the right to health, the rights of children, and the right to non-discrimination on the basis of sex. Some practices, such as genital cosmetic surgery and hymen repair, which are legally accepted in many countries, and not generally considered to constitute female genital mutilation, actually fall under the definition used here.” Therefore,in the exclusive context of the Doctor-and-Patient relationship,it is only the woman and her plastic surgeon who can resolve said semantic ambiguity.

• In the U.K., the medical article Requests for Cosmetic Genitoplasty: How Should Healthcare Providers Respond? (2007) indicated that “the few reports that exist on patients’ satisfaction with labial reductions are generally positive; but the assessments are short-term and lack methodological rigour”; and that the increased demand for cosmetic genitoplasty (labiaplasty) was indicated by the British National Health Service (NHS) having performed double the number of genitoplasty procedures in the year 2006, than were performed in the 2001–2005 period; and that the women who elected to undergo genitoplasty did so because having a pretty vulva was personally important them. Nonetheless, the authors, the clinical psychologist Lih Mei Liao, and the gynæcologist Sarah M. Creighton, said about the women that “the patients consistently wanted their vulvas to be flat, with no protrusion beyond the labia majora . . . some women brought along images to illustrate the desired appearance, usually from adverts or pornography that may have been digitally altered.” The report concluded that the “designer vagina craze” originated from the commercialism of sexual medicalization. Elsewhere, in Oceania, The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynæcologists published a like concern about the commercial exploitation of psychologically insecure women to undergo cosmetic genitoplasty.

• In the U.S., the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) published Committee Opinion No. 378: Vaginal “Rejuvenation” and Cosmetic Vaginal Procedures (2007), the medical college’s formal policy-statement of opposition to the commercial misrepresentations of labiaplasty, and associated vaginoplastic procedures, as medically “accepted and routine surgical practices”. The ACOG doubted the medical safety and the therapeutic efficacy of the surgical techniques and procedures for performing labiaplasty, vaginal rejuvenation, the designer vagina, revirgination, and Gräfenberg Spot amplification, and recommended that women seeking such genitoplastic surgeries must be fully informed, with the available surgical-safety statistics, of the potential health risks of surgical-wound infection, of pudendal nerve damage (resulting in either an insensitive or an over-sensitive vulva), of dyspareunia (painful coitus), of tissue adhesions (epidermoid cysts), and of painful scars.

• To determine whether or not women truly seek labiaplasty solely to have “more socially acceptable genitalia” the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health (ISSWSH) considered the practices of elective plastic surgery of the vulva and of female genital cutting (FGC) in the Third World. The report, Is Elective Vulvar Plastic Surgery ever Warranted and What Screening Should be Done Preoperatively? (2007) indicated that physical variations in the external appearance of the vulvo-vaginal complex are statistically normal, but that labiaplasty — like access to all types of medical treatment — is a woman’s human right. Nonetheless, the ISSWSH report concluded that vaginoplastic surgery might be medically warranted only after the woman undergoes a pre-operative psychological screening, and only if the woman remains so decided after having her mental health confirmed — yet the report also recommended that the vaginal surgery can be performed if the plastic surgeon decides that vaginoplastic surgery is medically necessary for her physical and mental health.

• In the U.S., the feminist organization The New View Campaign formally opposed labiaplasty (genitoplasty) as part of the medicalization of female sexuality, which the organization said is a great public mental health problem of contemporary American society. The specific opposition was to the existence and operation of legally un-regulated cosmetic-surgery clinics that function as business enterprises trading upon the medicalized sexuality of women, by appealing to their low self esteem and poor body image, thereby creating new health risks, and social norms about what prettiness is and what prettiness is not. To the end of making socially legitimate the natural morphologic diversity of the bodies of women, The New View Campaign proposed that countering sexual and bodily self-hatred among American women requires changing the American social norms that define what beauty is and what beauty is not, and by re-defining what social and personal behaviors constitute mental health.

See also

• Anal bleaching
• Clitoral hood reduction
• Elongated labia
• Labia stretching
• Vaginoplasty

References

1. ^ Davison SP, West JE, Caputy G, Talavera Fco., Stadelmann WK, Slenkovich NG. Labiaplasty and Labia Minora Reduction. (23 June 2008) eMedicine.com Cite error: The named reference "davison" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
2. Rezzai A, Jansson P. Clinical Techniques: Evaluation and Result of Reduction Labioplasty. The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. Volume 24, No. 2, 2007.
3. Masters WH, Johnson VE, Kolodny RC. Human sexuality. HarperCollins College Publishers, 1995, p. 47.
4. Sloane E. "Biology of women". Cengage Learning (2002) p. 32.
5. ^ Lloyd J, et al. Female Genital Appearance: ‘Normality’ Unfolds. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. May 2005. Volume 112. pp. 643–646. Female Genital Appearance: ‘normality’ Unfolds. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. May 2005, Volume 112, pp. 643–646. PMID 15842291
6. Rezzai A, Jansson P. Clinical Techniques: Evaluation and Result of Reduction Labioplasty. The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. Volume 24, No. 2, 2007.
7. Rezzai A, Jansson P. Clinical Techniques: Evaluation and Result of Reduction Labioplasty. The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. Volume 24, No. 2, 2007.
8. Hodgkinson DJ, Hait G. Aesthetic Vaginal Labiaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1984 September; 74(3):414–416.
9. Nevárez Bernal RA, Meráz Ávila D. Fusion of the Labia Minora as a Cause of Urinary Incontinence in a Postmenopausal Woman: a Case Report and Literature Review. Ginecología y Obstetricia de México. 2009 June; 77(6);287–290
10. Nevárez Bernal RA, Meráz Ávila D. Fusion of the Labia Minora as a Cause of Urinary Incontinence in a Postmenopausal Woman: a Case Report and Literature Review. Ginecología y Obstetricia de México. 2009 June;77(6);287–290
11. ^ Hodgkinson, Darryl J.; Hait, Glen (1984). "Aesthetic Vaginal Labioplasty". Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 74 (3): 414–6. doi:10.1097/00006534-198409000-00015. PMID 6473559.
12. ^ Alter, Gary J.; Alter, G J (1998). "A New Technique for Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction". Annals of Plastic Surgery. 40 (3): 287–90. doi:10.1097/00000637-199803000-00016. PMID 9523614.
13. Alter, Gary J. (2005). "Central Wedge Nymphectomy with a 90-Degree Z-Plasty for Aesthetic Reduction of the Labia Minora". Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 115 (7): 2144–5, author reply 2145. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000165466.99359.9E. PMID 15923876.
14. ^ Rouzier, Roman; Louis-Sylvestre, Christine; Paniel, Bernard-Jean; Haddad, Bassam (2000). "Hypertrophy of labia minora: Experience with 163 reductions". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 182 (1 Pt 1): 35–40. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70488-1. PMID 10649154.
15. Alter, Gary J. (2007). "Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction with Inferior Wedge Resection and Superior Pedicle Flap Reconstruction". Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 120 (1): 358–9, author reply 359–60. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000264588.97000.dd. PMID 17572600.
16. ^ Maas, Sylvester M.; Hage, J. Joris (2000). "Functional and Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction". Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 105 (4): 1453–6. doi:10.1097/00006534-200004040-00030. PMID 10744241.
17. ^ Giraldo, Francisco; González, Carlos; de Haro, Fabiola (2004). "Central Wedge Nymphectomy with a 90-Degree Z-Plasty for Aesthetic Reduction of the Labia Minora". Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 113 (6): 1820–1825, discussion 1826–1827. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000117304.81182.96. PMID 15114151.
18. Alter GJ. A New Technique for Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1998 March;40(3);287–290
19. Choi, Hee Youn; Kim, Kyung Tai (2000). "A New Method for Aesthetic Reduction of Labia Minora (the Deepithelialized Reduction Labioplasty)". Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 105: 419–422, discussion 423–424. doi:10.1097/00006534-200001000-00067.
20. Alter GJ. Aesthetic Labia minora and Clitoral Hood Reduction using Extended Wedge Resection. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. December 2008. 122(6):1780–1789.
21. Pardo J, Solà V, Ricci P, Guilloff E. Laser Labioplasty of Labia minora. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2006 April;93(1)38–43
22. Hodgkinson DJ, Hait G. Aesthetic Vaginal Labiaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1984 September; 74(3):414–416.
23. Veale D, Neziroglu F. Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Treatment Manual (2010) p. 104.
24. Veale D, Neziroglu, F. Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Treatment Manual. John Wiley and Sons, 2010, p. 104.
25. Miklos JR, Moore RD. "Labiaplasty of the Labia minora: Patients’ Indications for Pursuing Surgery", Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008;5(6)1492–1495.
26. Karamon I, Karamon A, Erdoğan D, Cauşoğlu YH, Aslan MK, Cakmak O. Isolated Labium minus Agenesis and Clitoral foreskin Hypertrophy: Case Review and Review of the Literature. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2008 June;21(3):145-146.
27. ^ Conroy RM (2006). "Female Genital Mutilation: Whose Problem, Whose Solution?". BMJ. 333 (7559): 106–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7559.106. PMC 1502236. PMID 16840444. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
28. Miklos JR, Moore RD. Labiaplasty of the Labia minora: Patients’ Indications for Pursuing Surgery. Journal of Sexual Medicine 2008;5(6)1492–1495.
29. http://www.newviewcampaign.org/userfiles/file/Dodson_vulvasheet.pdf
30. ^ Cormier, Zoë (fall 2005). "Making the Cut". Shameless online magazine. p. 4. Retrieved 3 March 2008. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) Cite error: The named reference "cormier" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
31. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/fgm/fgm_statement_2008.pdf
32. Davis, Simone Weil (2002). "Loose Lips Sink Ships". Feminist Studies. 28 (1): 7–35. doi:10.2307/3178492. JSTOR 3178492.
33. "Female genital mutilation", World Health Organization, February 2010.
34. "Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation", World Health Organization, 2008.
35. Menage J (2006). "Female Genital Mutilation: Whose Problem, Whose Solution? Psychological Damage is Immense". BMJ. 333 (7561): 260. doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7561.260. PMC 1523486. PMID 16873873. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
36. Bibbings LS (2006). "Female Genital Mutilation: Whose Problem, Whose Solution? Mutilation or Modification?". BMJ. 333 (7561): 259–60. doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7561.259-b. PMC 1523441. PMID 16873868. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
37. "Top Medical Journal Blasts "designer vagina" Craze". AFP via breitbart.com. 24 May 2007. Retrieved 29 May 2007.
38. Liao, Lih Mei (26 May 2007). "Requests for Cosmetic Genitoplasty: How Should Healthcare Providers Respond?". BMJ. 334 (7603). British Medical Journal: 1090–1092. doi:10.1136/bmj.39206.422269.BE. PMC 1877941. PMID 17525451. Retrieved 29 May 2007. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
39. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080801145404.zfnnx1i6&show_article=1
40. Navarro, Mireya (28 November 2004). "The Most Private of Makeovers". The New York Times. Retrieved 6 June 2009.
41. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007). "Vaginal "Rejuvenation" and Cosmetic Vaginal Procedures" (PDF): 2. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
42. Goodman MP, Bachmann G, Johnson C, Fourcroyo JL, Goldstein A, Goldstein G, Sklar S. Is Elective Vulvar Plastic Surgery ever Warranted and What Screening Should be Done Preoperatively? Journal of Sexual Medicine 2007;4:269–276
43. http://www.newviewcampaign.org/history.asp
44. http://www.newviewcampaign.org/fgcs.asp
45. http://www.dodsonandross.com/boutique/videos

Further reading

• Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. "Our Bodies, Ourselves", Simon and Schuster, 2005.
• Revill Jo. "The new nose job: designer vaginas", The Observer 17 August 2003.
• Rogers Lisa. "The quest for the perfect vagina", The Guardian 15 August 2008.
• Rogers Lisa. "The Perfect Vagina", Channel 4 documentary, 17 August 2008, accessed 18 September 2011.

• Use dmy dates from September 2011
• Genital modification
• Plastic surgery
• Surgical removal procedures
• Gynecological surgery