This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kafziel (talk | contribs) at 18:13, 14 June 2013 (→Requests for Comment: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:13, 14 June 2013 by Kafziel (talk | contribs) (→Requests for Comment: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Note: This page is sometimes semi-protected. If you are an IP editor or have a new account, it's possible you won't be able to post a message on this talk page.Please try this talk page first. But, if it's protected, you can leave me a message at User talk:Kafziel/Unprotected. I'll respond to good faith questions/comments as soon as I can. Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message on this talk page, I will reply on this talk page. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible. There is no need to post talkback templates on this page. Thanks!
 Archives |
Regarding that IP block
You blocked IP 184.20.209.241 (talk · contribs) yesterday, but it appears that with the block gone, he's back at my talk page with the same nonsense (see ). I dunno if you feel right in blocking him again, or if I should go back to AN where I initially posted for help. --MASEM (t) 23:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I was out of town yesterday. Looks like Starblind took care of it. Kafziel 13:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Requests for Comment
When did it become unacceptable to compile requests for comment on other editor's tendentious behaviour? Please point to the Misplaced Pages policy that says that I cannot do ti. I can the find the policy that says I can. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 17:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- I already pointed to it: WP:ATTACK. Specifically, keeping a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad user:XXX did" on your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate. I notice you didn't have a problem when it was that other user's page... is it not fair to apply it evenly on both sides? Kafziel 17:37, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Another user I B Wright had already raised an ANI on that very list where its existence was upheld. Although I did contribute to the ANI, I accepted the admin's opinion that it was acceptable. What has changed? DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of that, and I can't speak to other users' points of view. The page has been there for months and months, with no actual RfC to speak of. You can't just have a page where you indefinitely compile grievances against other editors for the purpose of harassing them at some point in the future. If you really feel the need to do that, you can save it on your own computer. I would be willing to email you the deleted contents, with the agreement that you not use them to create a page like that again. But it would be better just to move on. Kafziel 18:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Another user I B Wright had already raised an ANI on that very list where its existence was upheld. Although I did contribute to the ANI, I accepted the admin's opinion that it was acceptable. What has changed? DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)