Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mrt3366 (talk | contribs) at 06:52, 24 June 2013 (→Re. my request to rephrase your appeal: +). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talkpage

Let's talk. I'm Michael. If you have any query feel free to post it on this talk page.

Date: Wednesday, January 8. Time: 15 hrs 30 min(s) 10 second(s) (UTC)

Just so you know

Lately, I have not been around here a lot, but I am commenting here to register my disagreement about the way the situation has been handled during the past few days. You are a fantastic editor, and I can state that based on my past collaboration with you on numerous topics. I am frankly disappointed seeing all this. Bans and blocks seem to be flying too quickly here. I just hope that cooler heads prevail, and you are given a patient hearing. I can only imagine what would be going through your mind right now, but I do hope that you can remain calm and cool during all this, and not get into a funny mood yourself. :P Best, Anir1uph | talk | contrib 13:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, the ban is the worst of all the things that have happened to me on Misplaced Pages. I think until and unless Misplaced Pages incorporates some kind of effective and quick deterrence against patent abuse of Admin privileges among other things, nobody can be editing without redundant and unhelpful apprehensions about retribution from an offended admin. Just to clarify, I am NOT trying to imply that this has happened to me, no, all I am saying is there is a possibility. Mr T 16:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages seems to be getting worse and worse day by day. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 07:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages — if this is allowed to continue — will one day get reduced to nothing but a haphazard accumulation of separate fiefdoms under administrators and bureaucrats. In those fiefdoms their intemperate biases and political propaganda will rule the roost. Exceptions are becoming the rules here and that's where our project is headed. Mr T 07:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

I find it surprising that paid editors are not being doubted, whereas a trusted user is being topic-banned. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 07:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

I am astonished too. The inaction and apathy of Mr. Jimbo wales is to blame for this. I have, in recent past, tried to bring this issue to his attention, but he didn't even deign to provide a response, he doesn't care to descend from the mighty throne to mingle with a commoner like me. Let's see what happens. Mr T 07:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Have a look at this. Its a good bog about Misplaced Pages's black side. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 08:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hang in there mate. Irondome (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Admin kingdoms

Sorry to know that you are banned now. We will get you out of it and then we will get a list of admins who are very much involved in India-Pakistan-Bangladesh articles and are still acting as admins. They need to be banned from using their admin tools here. Let them do that on American Highway articles. Of thousands of admins present, why do these same faces keep showing up? If they themselves have no shame in breaking such rules, we have to bring it on them. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your signature

Hello, I must sadly point out your signature is in violation of WP:CUSTOMSIG, I'm counting 355 characters in your signature, and the maximum allowed number of characters are 255 (which is what the software truncates when input in the signature box) As I assume you use substitution of template when you are signing, which is permissible, but highly discourage WP:SIG#NT. Please make sure your signature is reduced in length. _→AzaToth 15:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the Section new link, I cant see any "clear box" anywhere, thus without having to enter section=new in the url, I can't make a new section here, which in my opinion is not a good tactic to allow people to post on your talkpage. _→AzaToth 15:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Sir, I will truncate it in a day. Is that okay? So far nobody has complained about the length of my signature. I don't remember interacting with you ever. Is there anything else I can help you with?
Please do not fiddle with my code, if you have a request, suggestion kindly state it here but don't change the codes unilaterally. There is a box above that allows for commenting (″post a new comment on my talk page″), I am not stopping anybody from commenting. I welcome comments. I am very agitated, please understand. Can it not wait? Please Mr T 15:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

If you promise to truncate it in a day or so, that fine, just wanted to avoid problem following the discussion on WP:ANI due to your signature breaking two lines (which also gives undue exposure to your additions relative others). Also I cannot find a "post a new comment on my talk page" link or form anywhere on your talk page, perhaps I'm blind. _→AzaToth 15:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Thank you sir. I have, in good faith, left a comment here asking about the length of my signature. I hope you don't mind? I need to be informed about everything, because I run a risk of being blocked on any pretext. Mr T 16:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

"Also I cannot find a "post a new comment on my talk page" link or form anywhere on your talk page" - really? No it's my bad-luck. My life is bounded by Finagle's Law. Mr T 16:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• Congrats Mr. T! Whatever be the reason you at least got a different admin talking this time. You should go and spread some wikiloves and throw away barnstars maybe and then no one would bother even if you have an .exe file in your signature. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Just so ya know...

(✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Re. my request to rephrase your appeal

First of all, I apologise for my tardiness in replying, but I've been kept away from my computer... However, the parts of your appeal that I consider attacks and assumptions of bad faith are mainly concentrated in your "context" part; more to the point, I'm referring mainly these two sentences: user Darkness Shines is pushing an obnoxious agenda in each one of them & Now, it's no secret that because of some recent changes in his proclivities he has managed to garner a few hardcore sympathizers who would want to see an exclusive and utterly one-sided focus on only anti-Muslim violence in India, who incessantly strive to blindly label every anti-Muslim violence in India as "pogrom". In these you accuse DS of pushing an "obnoxious agenda" and unnamed others to connive with him. Other parts that you might want to rephrase or remove are (even the extra-scrupulous Darkness Shines let it stay) (why are you singling him out?) and ban me based on a subjective pretext (here it's the word "pretext", which is an assumption of bad faith, because it implies that FPaS was acting with a different intent than the one he stated, which is the protection of the encyclopaedia). These last two examples are minor, but the first ones, in my opinion, are not. Salvio 16:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, sorry for a delayed response. I will rephrase. Mr T 06:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)