This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fan-1967 (talk | contribs) at 17:26, 1 June 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:26, 1 June 2006 by Fan-1967 (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Spime (theory)
seems to be utter rubbish Johnpaulb 07:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense, vanity, hoax, crackpot theory, unverifiable, whatever. Lukas 07:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Patent nonsense. Delete. GeorgeStepanek\ 08:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Lukas.--Andeh 10:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also a hoax, Wordspy credits an SF writer with the earliest citation of the word (which he apparently coined) in 2004. See http://www.wordspy.com/words/spime.asp Tychocat 13:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep in a form which simply records the details about the theory together with the fact that Kayatta invented it (nonsense though it is).--Alex Selby 14:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to only exist in this article and mirrors . Only George Kayatta I can find is a musician. Fan1967 16:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I find what appears to be a vanity entry by this guy in an alumni magazine for Case Western, where he claims this title of foremost “Renaissance Man in America,” but I can find nothing anywhere else on the web to justify it, and absolutely nothing connected with "Spime". The only actual uses of that word are connected to science fiction author Bruce Sterling, as documented in the article at Spime. - Fan1967 17:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep to give a chance for expansion, if not then delete. Xyrael 16:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)