This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coffeepusher (talk | contribs) at 21:28, 12 July 2013 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:28, 12 July 2013 by Coffeepusher (talk | contribs) (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please note that I do not respond to uncivilized threats from admins or other editors... =//= Johnny Squeaky 00:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Popular culture
Please do not keep changing 'Popular Culture' headings to 'Trivia'. They are not the same thing. Some Popular Culture content is substantive, not trivial, as supported by references. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative community. Continuous edit warring may result in being blocked. Span (talk) 12:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- In fact, usually they are the same thing. "In Popular Culture" is used as a synonym for "Trivia" by people who feel the name "Trivia" is too down-scale for Misplaced Pages, while they are still perfectly happy to include content that any reasonable person would classify as... Trivia! Also, please note that the Misplaced Pages "Manual of Style" does not require the removal (or the use of silly synonyms) of Trivia sections, indeed the word "discouraged" is not used in the section at all.
- And, the simple fact of the matter is, applying well discussed and well defined "rules" as to what is "trivia" and how "trivia" is to be marked, does not require a lengthy, drawn-out, "consensus" discussion, the consensus of what is "trivia" and how it is to be marked, is well established in a number of Misplaced Pages policy discussions. The demand for "consensus discussion" about what is "trivia" for every single article comes straight from the tool box of Misplaced Pages "editors" with WP:OWN issues. =//= Johnny Squeaky 02:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
IMDB as a Source
It's ironic that Misplaced Pages says that IMDB is unreliable as a source because its content is user submitted... =//= Johnny Squeaky 06:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Coffeepusher (talk) 21:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)