This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SuperDeng (talk | contribs) at 11:42, 2 June 2006 (→Some weird things here). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:42, 2 June 2006 by SuperDeng (talk | contribs) (→Some weird things here)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Initiation of the war by the Germans and the Finns
Whiskey, I am sorry, you are right: we must not get carried away, regardless of how appallingly biased some passages are.
- I agree. And on all points. This article is a mess. Somebody with little knowledge on the issue has added unsourced claims and added facts from totally different battles. Unfortunately I don't have time to seriously rewrite this article before the Continuation War is ready. And it seems to take time. :-(
Here we go:
- Erkki Nordberg, Arvio ja ennuste Venäjän sotilaspolitiikasta Suomen suunnalla, Helsinki, 2003, ISBN 951-884-362-7
"The Continuation War began with landing operations, aerial reconaissance and minelaying operations several days BEFORE (emph. mine) Germany attacked the USSR. Beginning on June 17 the Germans conducted aerial reconaissance over the territory of the USSR from the airfields at Rovaniemi and Kemijarvi. On the morning of June 22, Finnish submarines mined the waters in the area of Gogland (Estonia)" (citing from , see there for more fun fun facts)
- Just as good a source as any Finnish one: Great Soviet Encyclopedia, Finland, Moscow, 1974, ISBN 0028800109
"By June 17 Finland began the total mobilization. Finland joined the war against the USSR on the German side on June 22, although officially it declared war on June 26." (citing from the Russian text)
- Encyclopædia Britannica Premium, Finland, 2006, http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-26105
"When Germany attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, therefore, German troops were already on Finnish territory, and Finland was ready for war; its submarines, in fact, were operating in Soviet waters."
- Nordberg is a little too gratious here, as Finns had started sending patrols over the border quite soon after the Winter War ended. On the other issues, have you checked the Interim Peace article, which was separated from Continuation War? I have tried to present all the facts there, but please point out if I have missed some. Unfortunately I don't have Nordberg on my table, I have to visit library to check what he writes on the issue.
- The mining of Soviet (or Estonian) waters was done about 8-10 AM June 22. Two hours earlier Soviet garrison of Hanko started firing artillery to the Finnish side of the border and Soviet planes bombed Finnish ships near Ahvenanmaa. On the starting date, as German reconnaissance operations started already a week before Barbarossa, why not put it there in the article?
- The history of Soviet Air Force cites Finnish actions as provocations for which SAF responded with the strike of June 25. Platonov in the "Battle of Leningrad" describes orders to the army being "not to initiate hostilities as long as Finns do not openly side with Germans".
I hope it helps a little bit to clear up the confusion as to who started the war.
- The starter of the war is generally considered to being the one who is first to commit open hostilities against the other, regardless of the undercover actions before that. Soviet air offensive was too big and too carefully planned and executed that it couldn't be explained away. (Did Israel started six-day war? Or did Japan open the Pacific theatre?) All previous actions were too minor to act such a way. (Turkey was considered neutral or even anti-US in current US-Iraq war even it allowed US bombers to rise from its soil and allowed reconnaisence teams to operate from there.) The situation was like two schoolboys in the same table: Both kicking each other under the table until one of them starts using fists over the table.
- Finns were not blameless. Finns did allow German fleet to hide in the archipelago and come out to mine the Gulf of Finland. Finns did allow returning German bombers to refuel in Finland thus allowing bombardment of targets otherwise outside German reach. Finns have placed one division and some detachments under German command in Northern Finland. Finns have allowed Germans to place too many soldiers to the Northern Finland. But does it mean Finns started the war? No. The commander of the German forces was furious that his forces were not allowed to attack or even fire the Soviets on the other side of the border, openly preparing their fortifications.
Nazi butchers worked side-by-side with the democratic Finnish troops to block and starve to death 1 million civilians in Leningrad, precisely how Russians feared it would happen. If anyone is still in doubt, there is plenty more fun facts we can look up! Guinness man 11:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- I find it a great relief that finally someone from Russia gets interest to these articles. As my Russian skill is nonexistent, I have a certain handicap when using Russian/Soviet sources. Please add more facts whenever possible (but please give sources...), especially on issues you consider misrepresented. --Whiskey 21:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and even according to the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, the war officially started at June 26. ;-) --Whiskey 21:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for being a sane and fair person :) Sadly, everyone is pressed for time, but I'm trying to check on things periodically and look up some sources. And btw, I'm from sunny California :) (not so sunny at the moment) Guinness man 06:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Separate war
You have to make up your mind with regard to the separate war-theory (for the Continuation War). Was the war contemporary with, or a part of, WWII? Misplaced Pages better stick to one version by default, and expand on arguments for or against in one appropriate article. /M.L.
Comment: From Finland's perspective the war was separate but not from international and Soviet, although internationally the only enemy of Finland was Soviet Union. Even in Finland both the winter war and continuation war were considered (and still are) to be part of WW2 in a larger international scale. Molotov-Ribbentrop pact is one "evidence" of this.
Some weird things here
some really wild claims made here - sourses? Too much Fantasy Undefeatable Finnish Warriors and other BS. 150 000 troops is not a 1/3 of Soviet Army anyway, and so on 20 000 losses also doesn't look like much.
- I agree that 1/3 claim is fantasy, and I haven't found it in any respectable source of the battle. This article needs serious cleanup, as it concentrates too much to what happened before the battle esp. at Valkeasaari. (f.ex. that artillery fire concentration...)--Whiskey 15:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
"Nazi butchers"
Don't generalize. By your logic all Soviet soldiers were fanatical communist.
"to block and starve to death 1 million civilians in Leningrad"
Finnish did not take part in the siege and the siege was not a war crime. Stalin could have evacuated civialian population if he would have wanted to, like in Stalingrad. If Finnish could evacuate over 500000 people from the territories that were given to Soviet Union after Winter War in few days notice, Soviets could certainly do the same with longer amount of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Kurt Leyman (talk • contribs)
- Where exactly did I generalize or used the word all or all Germans or all Finns? Are you by any chance denying that among the Nazis were sadistic people who starved and mass-murdered the Jewish people, Slavs, Gypsies and others?
- I am not even going to talk about the second part. Could have-would have-should have. Point me to at least a single credible reference with your claims. Guinness man 18:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- "Where exactly did I generalize or used the word all or all Germans"
When you said "nazi butchers" while you were talking about Leningrad.
"Are you by any chance denying that among the Nazis were sadistic people who starved and mass-murdered the Jewish people, Slavs, Gypsies and others?"
No.
"I am not even going to talk about the second part."
Operation Barbarossa started on June 22nd 1941 and the Siege of Leningrad on September 8th 1941. That means that there were 76 days before the siege began in total. If Finnish could evacuate over 500000 people from the territories that were given to Soviet Union after Winter War in few days notice with much smaller resources than Soviet Union had, Soviets should be certainly be able to do the same with longer amount of time and resources. You cannot possibly claim that something would have prevented the evacuation of the city in July if Stalin would have ordered it.
As for the minings, what are the proves that the Soviets knew about them? That they were laid doesn't prove that they knew about them. Hence one cannot say that it led to the Soviet attack. It is widely accepted that it was Hitler's radio speech in which he talked about alliance with Finland that led to the bombings. Kurt.
- Your acts of vandalism are pure and simple, all the items you removed have been sourced. You not only removed real information but also the sources which proves that you are only interested in vandalism. (Deng 11:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC))