This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anonymous anonymous (talk | contribs) at 12:40, 2 June 2006 (To Do list for article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:40, 2 June 2006 by Anonymous anonymous (talk | contribs) (To Do list for article)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- "The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting views. The policy requires that, where there are or have been conflicting views, these should be presented fairly, but not asserted."
- This article seems to be filled with assertions, especially the racism by country section:
- "Austria has sometimes been criticised of trying to sweep its Nazi past under the carpet, typified by the widely pronounced myth that Austria was a victim of Nazi aggression rather than a willing participant."
- "In fact, Canada's treatment of Aboriginal-Canadians is still governed by a document frequently described as racist, the Indian Act."
- "Problems are currently under hot debate, although socialist Finnish government denies them."
- It goes without saying that racism is a pretty contentious topic and accusing a nation of racism is a pretty big claim but even these assertions and historic conclusions for the most part aren't even accompanied by any referenced citations. The Good news is that problems with the by countries section and other POV issues are old news to you guys and you're already working on solutions. Because you guys are still debating solutions (like in the Canada section) the article really isn't technically stable.
- Also I think this article would benefit from additional pictures (though this is obviously secondary); there must be tons more relevant pictures out there for this article than what it currently has