This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carolmooredc (talk | contribs) at 17:24, 30 July 2013 (cleanup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:24, 30 July 2013 by Carolmooredc (talk | contribs) (cleanup)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please post comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk Page of that Article if it is relevant to all editors.'
 Green Line for Barnstars, Archives, Other Stuff
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Gender bias task force
Hi Carol, something here you might be interested in. Best, SlimVirgin 00:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
SPECIFICO
Many thanks for the notice. After the multiple bogus edit war warnings and wikihounding, yeah, I am very interested. --Abel (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Bad week to do an on SPECIFICO with people vacationing etc. and the issue being complicated. But already had one issue go stale, so thought I better do it anyway. Misplaced Pages doesn't seem to be able to deal with complicated issues any more and a lot of things that used to get responses don't. Editor drop off really taking its toll. Or maybe they all hate one faction of Austrian libertarian types :-( Among other theories. Frustrating. CarolMooreDC - talk to me🗽 15:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Given that trashing of BLPs is not a big issue anymore, I do believe that Misplaced Pages eventually could face a class action lawsuit charging Misplaced Pages Foundation malfeasance if some creepy-assed lawyers ever decided to put one together with 30 or 40 aggrieved subjects of bios. All they have to do is search throughout the BLP policy, BLPN and its header, ANI and other relevant pages and they could do a real big case based on copious written evidence.
- At least I've figured out what my favorite Wikimedia essay is. User:Carolmooredc 12:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
reverted BLP edits?
If you can't remember what edits have been reverted, go to my edit history and figure it out. (In other words, don't make vague, unsubstantiated accusations!) Besides being off-topic as to the RfC issue, your comment insinuates that I don't know what is proper procedure or policy. That is hardly the case. In fact, in this particular RfC, I am trying to resolve the BLP problems in the North article. Read the discussion above and you will see that I am trying to get rid of the OR posted by editors who have an axe to grind. Please remove your post on the RfC threaded discussion. – S. Rich (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
CORRECTION -- It looks like I misread your comment about BLP reverts. You were referring to Steele. In any event, such comments about Steele's editing history are off-topic. In this regard they are PA because they do not advance the discussion at hand. Please remove the entire post, including what you addressed to me. – S. Rich (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- I guess I forgot to save this 1/2 hour ago, so I'll try again. Please do not post anything but official notices on my talk page. (And I assume they will not be frivolous ones.) I experience your constant chiding me to behave as you think I should as to be harassment, even if you are right 1/3 of the time. If you have a complaint or others do they can make official ones, or do it on the article talk page. Thank you. User:Carolmooredc 18:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Official notice on ANI on disruptive/insulting behavior
see: here. Steeletrap (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, if only.... User:Carolmooredc 06:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)