Misplaced Pages

User talk:KI

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jacoplane (talk | contribs) at 21:16, 3 June 2006 (Regarding your message on my talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:16, 3 June 2006 by Jacoplane (talk | contribs) (Regarding your message on my talk page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —xyzzyn 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your message on my talk page

Hi, since you seem to be unaware of it, I thought I'd point out that we do have a civility policy on Misplaced Pages. While I personally don't really care how you speak to me, using this kind of tone could very well intimidate other users, so please refrain from doing so in the future. Also, I've told you this before, but you continue to misunderstand the concept of vandalism. Good-faith edits are not vandalism. Perhaps you don't agree with what a contributor is saying, perhaps you think the quality of the contributions is not very high, but that still does not make the contributions vandalism, and your accusations of vandalism on User talk:Marknw are wholly unfounded. Collaborate with others to improve the quality of the edits, and if you're going to revert someone the very least you can do is to explain your reasons on the talk page. So far the only thing I've seen you do is substing vandalism templates, which is not enough. jacoplane 21:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)