This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crisco 1492 (talk | contribs) at 08:15, 16 August 2013 (re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:15, 16 August 2013 by Crisco 1492 (talk | contribs) (re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Invited comment
This RfC seems like a trainwreck waiting to happen; it's both too sprawling and too forcefully one-sided, occasionally bordering on insulting ("the Nick-D and Ian Rose article type that has so many panties in a bunch"... "Some have raised the issue of removing South Side, Chicago from the list for reasons that may be for no other reason than to contest any authority I claim over the project"). Tony, I'd urge you to have a third party draft a neutral, concise version of this instead; you can still post your version of events in the comments. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- I have removed the panties reference.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 08:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- In terms of "too sprawling", I'd say it is sort of modelled after the most recent RFC that I have been in that seems to be successful: Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Good Article RfC--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 08:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Check how that RFC was originally worded, before side issues started popping up. The current one is sprawling. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- In terms of "one-sided", I am open to discussion on anything that you might misrepresent an issue presented.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 08:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- In terms of "insulting", it is still a draft and we have this talk page to iron anything out.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 08:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Concise? Do you mean less background on the issues or fewer issues?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 08:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Read WP:RFC, particularly Misplaced Pages:RFC#Statement_should_be_neutral_and_brief. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)