Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Botto (talk | contribs) at 15:53, 5 September 2013 (→Current requests for protection). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:53, 5 September 2013 by Botto (talk | contribs) (→Current requests for protection)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: view • edit


    Archiving icon
    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Carl Grimes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: This page is undergoing an edit war on the behalf of sock puppet I.P.s of User:Bens dream and others. In order to stem this issue, it's best to remove his reach of his I.P. addresses. DarthBotto talk•cont 15:53, 05 September 2013 (UTC)

    Paul Caddis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: First an IP, now a brand-new account, have started to vandalize this article. Please shut it down for now. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Pokémon X and Y (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. —Ryulong (琉竜) 12:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Khazar Lankaran FK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This sockpuppet IP's adding wrong information and despite my warning, still continuing to vandalising. NovaSkola (talk) 00:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    American upper class (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: - IP edit war, and needs attention from editors willing to discuss. Attleboro (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    2013–14 Real Madrid C.F. season‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary full-protection: content dispute. Frietjes (talk) 20:42, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Glen Johnson (English goalkeeping coach born 1985) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Seperate IPs making unsourced changes even after being warned. I can't find a source for their edits, although it's hard to find anything on this guy. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    The Big Bang Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: There have been reverts on vandalism, copyright infringements, and content. George Ho (talk) 12:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf 13:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Futurama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism/disruptive edits due to the series current television run ending tonight. STATic message me! 06:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Talk:Taman Shud Case (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – User using multiple IPs keeps using the talk page as a forum and posting inappropriate material. Pending changes allows IPs to still contribute, but for reviewers to let in only what's relevant. Paris1127 (talk) 01:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes doesn't work on talk pages. We might have to semi-protect off and on. A rangeblock might work, but I dont know how to do those. GedUK  12:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Crash Bandicoot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: The same person using multiple IPs continues to vandalise this page. It has already been protected three times and he still continues, even after a month or two of protection. Please make this permanent. 88.109.26.77 (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just a little early for indef protection. Let's try 6 months first. GedUK  12:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    List of Adventure Time episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, which is composed mostly of IPs simply wiping all information from the section marked "Season 6". To give a frame of reference, this has happened four times in the last month alone. Adventure Time articles are hit with a high level of vandalism, so "semi-protection" is being asked for.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Adventure Time (season 6) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, which is composed mostly of IPs simply wiping all information. This has happened four times since the article was created in June of 2013. Adventure Time articles are hit with a high level of vandalism, so "semi-protection" is being asked for.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    2014 FIFA World Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2014 World cup, has been vandalized many times and will be in the future. A world know event millions of people follow and IPs go in and add there team in the final and so on. QED237 (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Anthony Johnson (colonist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: A new editor (User:Scoobydunk) is significantly altering the article based on a single source (a PBS documentary) and WP:OR arguing that an Indentured servant is a slave, therefore Anthony Johnson was not the first slave owner in Virginia. That Johnson was is supported by the vast majority of historians. I have posted that I am rewriting the entire article and to wait until I have finished in a few days but he has ignored this this making the rewrite difficult. See also the article Talk page and my own Talk page for his claims. Wayne (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    I have no idea where I can protest this "semi-protection" but will offer a few things here. I've read the rules and won't engage in an argument in this section. Firstly, I'm not the one claiming an indentured servant is a slave, WLRoss is the one claiming that John Casor who was an indentured servant is a slave. Secondly, I've used more than one source to support my argument. Thirdly, it's nowhere near the "vast majority of historians" and I've demonstrated this by listing numerous sources on a variety of subjects to discredit the claim that Casor was the first slave. Lastly, it is clear that Wayne Ross has a anti-establishment agenda and he says as much on his about page "I’m very much interested in all history. Not just the propaganda history you learn in school but the warts and all history you never hear about because it “may” offend someone or does not suit the agenda of the country teaching it." I'm fine with history that may be offensive to some, but not when that "history" clearly goes against officially documented laws that were established 10-14 years prior. He clearly has an agenda on this.Scoobydunk (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
    Declined Protection of any sort isn't really appropriate against one editor. Discuss on the talk page, , use other WP:DR methods, but if it carries on, then we can take action against the individual. GedUK  12:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Durga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Removal of maintenance templates, deletion of infobox, continued addition of unsourced information by IPs and unconfirmed users. Paris1127 (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Partition of India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SMS 15:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined, I can't see obvious socking there, and I don't know which sok youo're referring to, so I can't check beyond. If you think there's socking, report to WP:SPI. GedUK  11:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Brunei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – need a pending changes review protection on this article as many IP's started to make some unseen vandalism. — иz нίpнόp 09:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I'd have semiprotected myself and would recommend if problems continue. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    John Wisden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism caused by added attraction of today's Google doodle. Widefox; talk 09:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Ina Fried (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Permanent semi-protection if that can be done. The history edits show a non-stop parade of people changing the gender pronouns of this BLP trans woman. Sportfan5000 (talk) 03:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected indefinitely. yes, will be a perennial issue, hence semi Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Nipsey Hussle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced additions to a WP:BLP. STATic message me! 02:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Paul Attanasio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's a video trending right now of Paul's son being immature:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1lqgb8/apparently_his_father_is_a_famous_screenwriter_or/

    There has been a series of vandal edits b/c of this. Attaboy (talk) 22:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Already protected. by another admin. SlimVirgin 00:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    TheREALCableGuy target articles

    Temporary semi-protection: Continued targets of banned TheREALCableGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), removing sourced information and required information about FCC programming requirements. Nate • (chatter) 22:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Continuing currently under 66.87.101.29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), but block would be futile as user plugs-unplugs using a Sprint broadband stick. Nate • (chatter) 02:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
    Semi-protected indefinitely. all of them. Folks can try unprotecting at some point in the future when this has settled down. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Melissa Scott (pastor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Persistent and long-term BLP content violation from anonymous editors including 2x in last 24 hours. — Brianhe (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected indefinitely. SlimVirgin 00:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Grave Digger (truck) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: - First an IP, now a brand-new account, insist on removing information without giving any explanation whatsoever. They've also violated 3RR (the IP and the account are clearly one and the same) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    What's past is prologue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Loads of vandalism. James12345 20:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Colm Cooper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of OR, use of Euphisim both against MOS and WP:BLP. Murry1975 (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin 00:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Avon View High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Repeatedly edited to add false and unsourced information, as well as personal attacks on real people through this page. 18:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined - Hasn't been edited since June. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    User:Laynester28 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason, this page is repeated edited by other users. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Donald Featherstone (wargamer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Short-term semi-protection: There have been repeated unsourced edits stating that he died yesterday (I have no reason to suspect bad faith). I'm trying to find WP:RS for this, but no luck so far. Temporary protection may persuade those editing to help, rather than simply adding unsourced assertions. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. (1 week) Armbrust 11:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    London School of Business and Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: 5 days of persistent edit warring. Theroadislong (talk) 14:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Ectaco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant ip editing against the consensus. Karl 334 14:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Elephant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection for a few days please. Edit warring by two editors. Hopefully they will be able to reach a consensus view soon. Axl ¤ 09:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined I've warned both of them. If it carries on, report them (both if necessary) to WP:3RRN. GedUK  11:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Hinduism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary full protection: Having 2 unusual revisionist. Removing old sourced content without taking participation in talk pages. Capitals00 (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. You've been blocked by someone else. GedUK  11:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Transformers: Age of Extinction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upcoming film that is still in production. Article has been bombarded with either vandalism or unsourced info by various IP users. Areaseven (talk) 01:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined, There seem to be plenty of constructive edits from IPs as well GedUK  11:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Operation Blue Star (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war by Jujhar.pannu with multiple editors instead of engaging in proper discussion at talk page and clearly going against earlier formed consensus. . Vigyanitalk 23:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined, If it's one person, report them for edit warring to WP:3RRN GedUK  11:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Bulgarian Children's Chorus and School Gergana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple Users making pretty much the same edits and edit warring as far back as August 10th. Also includes one IP user (that may or may not also be the same person as some other accounts) previously blocked for edit warring that has continued making the same edits after the block ended. Transcendence (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    Already protected by administrator Bilby. (7 days) Armbrust 18:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Pete (Disney) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: IP disruption over species has continued since it was unprotected. LittleJerry (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    The users appears to use other IPs too. LittleJerry (talk) 23:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    List of Grand Theft Auto V characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of leaked and un-sourced content from IP users. All have been warned through edit summaries multiple times, but they continue to add this leaked content. If it's only locked until September 17th, then that's fine. --Rhain1999 (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    Semi-protected. GedUK  11:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Subway Surfers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite full protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. All were warned in user talk page to stop adding unsourced content. Page currently in Semi-Protection. ///EuroCarGT 20:56, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    Already protected by administrator Garion96.. GedUK  11:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    2013 India–Pakistan border skirmishes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Currently being targeted by IP socks of Nangparbat,. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined, Not clear it's them GedUK  11:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Canada men's national youth soccer teams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reposing of biographies of living persons violation. Specifically Misplaced Pages:DOB problems ...these youth dont need there names nor birth dates published for all the world to see. -- Moxy (talk) 17:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    Already protected by administrator Gamaliel. (1 week full protection) Armbrust 09:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Mafia state (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Revert warring by anonymous user(s). Ukrained2012 (talk) 11:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    ukrained2012 has been repeadtedly edit warring, he kept inserting a massive amount of unnecessary categories which is against wp:overcat and some picture that has nothing to do with the subject so before anyone protects the page ukrained2012 edits needs to be reverted 83.180.179.15 (talk) 15:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
    i requested a third opinon which needs to be answered before protecting the page 83.180.179.15 (talk) 15:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    if protection is nessesary then go with full protection because the other user can continue reverting in a semi protected state 83.180.179.15 (talk) 17:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    The request for a Third Opinion has been declined at the 3O page for lack of adequate talk page discussion. Per the dispute resolution policy disputes must be thoroughly discussed at the article talk page before seeking dispute resolution. — TransporterMan (TALK) (as 3O volunteer) 18:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
    discussion is pointless in THIS SPECIFIC SITUATION i will never be able to convince this user and i doubt he can convince me, and if we try that it will just be back and fourth warring that wont lead anywhere 83.180.179.15 (talk) 18:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
    Please provide some more any diffs to prove your real "attempts to convince me". Wishes, Ukrained2012 (talk) 22:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    This appears to be just one user attempting to bulldoze his view though . He has only applied for protection as the IP user has apposed those views. Protection is not appropriate -this is just a minor disagreement about whether a picture and categories are appropriate or not. Discussion has now begun on the talk page as it should have done originally. --Rushton2010 (talk) 19:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    I find Rushton2010's comment arrogant to the extent of incivility. If two (or even more) users get in a content dispute, none of them could be disregarded as "just one user attempting to bulldoze his view". And the "bulldoze his view" part is demonstrably not about me: it is actually me who urges the talk page discussion of content.
    This semi-protection request is hereby renewed after fresh deletions by an anon ahead of any discussion attempts. Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

    This is a issue between two users who disagree with each other over a minor and uncontroversial issue of categorisation and the inclusion of a picture. The article is not being vandalised or disrupted in any way: the inclusion or exclusion of the categories or picture make no great affect on the quality of the article and neither user is obviously "right" or "wrong" with regards to inclusion.
    Instead/before going to the talk page, one user comes here hoping to "protect" the article, which would thereby block the other user from editing the article. What exactly is that, if not that user trying to bulldoze his views through avoiding discussion with the other user? It is a content dispute between that IP user and Ukrained and nothing more.
    In requesting such a block Ukrained has shown disrespect to the IP user, who's views are just as relevant and valuable as his own. He also clearly has not read wikipedia's policies; especially that surrounding article protection. And laughable claims of incivility against myself, who has not become involved in his edit war and only commented here for what it is... Anyone looking for incivility need only look to the user's messages on the article's talk page which are very angry, condescending, disrepectful and verge on personal attacks.
    This is a user that will not be happy unless his own view wins out: on the talk page even states "anything in this article may be removed after either reaching consensus (in this case, at least with me)". He clearly believes he owns the article and shows shocking disrespect to the valuable work done by IP editors.
    I reiterate again; this is just a simple petty disagreement with no right or wrong answer, that should have been discussed at the talk page from the start. Not a suitable case for article protection. --Rushton2010 (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    And in response to Ukrained's question about why I have not edited the article myself, its because I only visited the article to see whether protection or warranted or not, and wished to remain independent of the edit warring.--Rushton2010 (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    List of best-selling game consoles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Interpretation of sources. « Ryūkotsusei » 17:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined, There's been no edits for a couple of days now, this request is probably slightly stale. GedUK  11:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Growth of religion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent assertion of bogus content, by few Ips. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

    Declined, No reason to protect to favour one side in an content dispute GedUK  11:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Lilith Sternin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotection: I tried asking the protecting admin, Beeblebrox, for unprotection. However, he has not yet responded, and the page is still move-protected. As I told him, I made a mistake, and I promised to him that I will not re-move it to a different name ever again. Ever! I will swear that I'll leave the article title as is. George Ho (talk) 22:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

    Given your stated intention not to rename the article, why does move protection matter enough that you are bothering to ask for its removal? Monty845 20:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
    Protection isn't necessary if there are no more title disputes. And I'm sure no one will even try to move it. That's all. --George Ho (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
    I don't think any admin is willing to unprotect given the length of time this has sat here and that I can't actually see where you spoke to Beeblebrox about unprotection. tutterMouse (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
    User talk:Beeblebrox/Archive 30#Lilith Sternin. --George Ho (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
    Missed that, thanks. I'd take that as a decline of your request, it was 22 days ago and if he hasn't replied by now I doubt he's going to unprotect either given the past involvement between you and this article. tutterMouse (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.

    Category: