Misplaced Pages

User:Richardcavell

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Keelm (talk | contribs) at 17:53, 6 June 2006 (reverted vandalism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:53, 6 June 2006 by Keelm (talk | contribs) (reverted vandalism)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
My Userboxes
Template:User wikipedia/Administrator Nominee
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
This user comes from Australia.
MixThis user has been influenced by too many dialects of English to use one orthography, vocabulary and grammar consistently.
This contributor to Misplaced Pages is male.
This user is straight.
Template:User queer-4

Richardcavell is Richard Cavell, a man from Melbourne, Australia.

You may email him by clicking here and leaving a message.

I'm a doctor with interests in anatomy/radiology and medical law/forensics/administration. I like to make small corrections every now and then. I also occasionally contribute articles on medical topics. I'm interested in Aussie showbusiness, particularly community access television, such as Channel 31 Australia. I often create stubs and initiate new parts of articles.

I hate paedophiles and I enjoy shaming them. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Here are some articles that I've contributed substantially to:

The contributions that I'm most proud of, though, are grammatical/spelling/usage upgrades. Although you may see this as pedantic and unhelpful, I think that it is important to use the language correctly. It gives so much credibility to wikipedia to have precise, concise expression.

RfA:

I believe that Requests for Administration are being used as a forum to indulge in editcountitis. It seems to me that the principal criterion for supporting Administrator requests is a person's edit count, regardless of the quality of those edits. This means that Administrator status is being used as a kind of automatic reward for time-serving. The principal criterion should be whether or not Misplaced Pages would benefit from the candidate being given the admin tools. I have therefore been spending time at RfA.

I'm an advocate of giving anti-vandal tools, such as automated rollback, to registered users who are not admins.

XfD:

I've also been spending time at AfD/RfD. I think that these debates tend to stray too far toward deletionism. I at least want to have my say before good articles and redirects get deleted.

I'm also an advocate of making WP:VSCA a criterion for speedy deletion.

I don't see anything wrong with crossing namespaces with redirects when it helps a person find what he or she is looking for.

A Barnstar! The Barnstar of Diligence
In recognition of balanced, thoughtful and above all dedicated performance on AfD debates of all flavours. Rarely do editors straddle the inclusionist / deletionist divide so effectively. Deizio talk 23:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Categories: