This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ThinkEnemies (talk | contribs) at 18:27, 11 September 2013 (→Block extended to indefinite: spaces). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:27, 11 September 2013 by ThinkEnemies (talk | contribs) (→Block extended to indefinite: spaces)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
24 December 2024 |
|
Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:ThinkEnemies - personal attacks & NOTHERE. Thank you. ItsZippy 14:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Being that I'm still blocked, there's not much I can do to contribute. Glancing at that thread appears to show a personal attack against me (unsubstantiated sock puppetry claims), but I'm not offended as some blowback should be expected after my embarrassing outburst. All I can offer is heartfelt apologies. Oh, and I have no desire to edit conservapedia, which I always thought was a liberal troll site. Maybe it's just a troll site, period. Not really my cup of tea, either way. †TE†Talk 17:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Block extended to indefinite
I've extended your block to indefinite, as a result of your use of homophobic slurs against another editor on top of a long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing and edit-warring. You may appeal the block by the usual means, including the {{unblock}} template, the unblock ticket request system, or by emailing the Ban Appeals Subcommittee. MastCell 18:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- @MastCell: I understand overreactions, I specialize in them -- But please don't fling feces at me by saying ThinkEnemies has a "long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing." That statement is patently false. I shouldn't have attacked the person of Zippy. I shoudn't have edit-warred on the clear misrepresentation of a decade-old cited source and violation of LEDE. That is a fact. I have no problem accepting my punishment for these acts, but please don't make stuff up. It's cheap and rather petty of you. †TE†Talk 18:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)