This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gschalet (talk | contribs) at 02:06, 11 October 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:06, 11 October 2013 by Gschalet (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Insects Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Indigenous countries
What countries do they appear in? it doesn't say.
Synonymous name of species
See Talk:Black_carpenter_ant--Wynler | Talk 20:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Worker... or a queen?
On the caption of the first figure, it says it depicts a worker. Deciding from the shape (and colour) of the specimen's thorax and size of it's abdomen, I'm pretty sure it's a queen, though. --Mosher81 (talk) 06:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed and changed.--FUNKAMATIC ~talk 22:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Merged Camponotus_saundersi
I merged the Camponotus_saundersi article here. For more details see:
Talk:Camponotus_saundersi#Common_name.3F and Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Camponotus_saundersi
Ikip (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Inch
Carpenter ants are large (¼–1 in)
I know this is English wiki, but many people not from Britain use the larger English wiki, and I at least have no idea how large an inch would be. Could you add something like '2 cm'? Please? :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.171.7.38 (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
someone deleted the symbiont section by mistake
someone deleted the symbiont section by mistake
Can anyone verify this ?
- Routine vandalism. I reverted it. Art LaPella (talk) 18:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
wood
i know a quite a few ant speies from the genus "camponotus", which don't live in wood. do they not count as carpenter ants? בלנק (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Behavior Section
I edited the behavior section. The section on relatedness needs to be cited.Kaijones5245 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaijones5245 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Undergraduate Peer Review (Washington University in St. Louis The behavior section is highly informative, and I only made a few grammatical corrections. Perhaps, a small clarification on the comparison of the sex ratio between P. annularis and P. exclamans would be useful. Overall, very strong work on this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gschalet (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)--Gschalet (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)gschalet
Categories: