This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoslynSKP (talk | contribs) at 06:42, 28 October 2013 (→Second Battle of Amman: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:42, 28 October 2013 by RoslynSKP (talk | contribs) (→Second Battle of Amman: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is Widr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73Auto-archiving period: 1 day  |
Tianeptine
Hello,
I redid edits on the tianeptine page. Basically I removed the passive voice (i.e., "it is increasingly being thought that" vs. "many believe") or ("This is believed to be achieved" vs. "This may be achieved"), removed ambiguous statements (i.e., "Perhaps the most studied hypothesis is that..." vs. "Some researchers hypothesize..."), and basically improved the quality of writing (i.e., "it is increasingly being thought that the efficacy of many antidepressants is due in large part to their promotion of synaptic plasticity" vs. "many believe the efficacy of antidepressants is related to promotion of synaptic plasticity"). I was able to remove 85 characters with no modifications to the actual content. If you want to undo my edits, please make some modifications to the original content to improve the quality of writing (remove ambiguity, remove the passive voice, etc.). Wolololol (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)wolololol
- I added one word to make it easier to understand. The beginning of your original edit was a bit more difficult to understand which is why I reverted it. Widr (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
I am Delvin Hughley and I would like the page deleted. My personal info is linking me to that page and I don't want that, such as phone number. I have another page started on here.----
Delvin Hughley page
I neded that page deleted ASAP. My life is being exposed and endangered. Thanks Delvin5 (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- The article seems to have been deleted by now. Widr (talk) 04:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
World Food Day
Hello,
Your edits on the World Food Day are promotional and only tangentially related to World Food Day. Please do not revert my edits, or only revert to edits that have to do with World Food Day that comply with Misplaced Pages's writing style, as opposed to a promotional message for an agricultural college. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdougher (talk • contribs) 13:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
University of Timbuktu Edit
Hello How are you? I presume well.
My name's Ekon and I'd really rather you not revert my edits. When I do make changes to any article on this site I always back the changes up with peer-reviewed, indisputable evidence. Furthermore, the changes I made were consistent with the original topic. I simply added new information and I also included links to view the original information. You made the claim that my changes were not constructive. Could you expound on that statement please?
Sincerely: Ekon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs298400 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Ekon. You need to format your additions correctly and avoid adding original research. Please also use the preview button, so you can actually see how the article will look after you save it. Widr (talk) 04:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleting the info?
Whats your reason for deleting the info? talk 11:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Did you pay attention to your edits? You had added parts of Ne-Yo's infobox to the article. Widr (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes! I changed parts of Ne-Yo's infobox to the article. EricEgo2012 (talk) 1:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- You also keep adding unsourced info to the article. Note that you are about to break the 3RR rule; either add a reliable source or undo your edits. Thank you. Widr (talk) 17:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
you are totally right. these changes dont appear constructive at all, and i certainly dont recall having made them at all. it doesnt make ANY sense. i dont hope anybody has hacked into my ip adress. sorry for the trouble. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.191.187.83 (talk) 03:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry
Hey bro I'm sorry about that i thought it would be funny please forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KIATHEGAMER (talk • contribs) 22:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Second Battle of Amman
I am paying attention. That image was renamed with incorrect information. It was the 'Anzac Mounted Division' --Rskp (talk) 06:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)