Misplaced Pages

Talk:River Song (Doctor Who)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 17:18, 4 November 2013 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:River Song (Doctor Who)/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:18, 4 November 2013 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:River Song (Doctor Who)/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the River Song (Doctor Who) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDoctor Who High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBBC Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconTelevision Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconScience Fiction Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFictional characters
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

List of appearances

The character of river song, as portrayed by alex kingston, has actually appeared in TWELVE episodes, not eleven;

  • 1. silence in the libary
  • 2. the forest of the dead
  • 3. the time of angels
  • 4. flesh and stone
  • 5. the pandorica opens
  • 6. the big bang
  • 7. the impossible astronaut
  • 8. day of the moon
  • 9. a good man goes to war
  • 10. let's kill hitler
  • 11. Closing time (although it was a cameo, it was still a piece of new material never seen before and of about 5 minuites in length so technically it still counts as a river song episode)
  • 12. the wedding of river song

just to clarrify Frogkermit (talk) 13:14, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

And the mini-episodes (First Night / Last Night)? ZarhanFastfire (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Susan's grandmother?

Just how much out of sequence are the Doctor and River? Is she supposed to be Susan's grandmother? 173.190.143.166 (talk) 02:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

That's a stretch. How likely is it the Doctor knew his own granddaughter but has spent most of 1200 years unaware of who mothered his own children? Might as well ask if Jenny is Susan's mother (Oh, I've said too much.) ZarhanFastfire (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Spoilers

Someone has posted spoilers from the series 7 finale. In the article. Just thought you should know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.112.117 (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Orientation

Other than the statement made by Moffat that Song is bisexual, is there anything in the Doctor Who canon that substantiates this? — Loadmaster (talk) 22:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Not really. The only allusion to River's 'open mindedness' is a remark she makes about an auton, which is a typical "Captain Jack" type of joke.Zythe (talk) 12:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Horrible spoilers - backwards article

Subsequent to posting the following rant, I went over the page's history, and it seems I'm not the first to complain about spoilers. I have allowed the information to remain in the article, IN IT'S APPROPRIATE PLACE. I've removed the spoilers from the header, but I believe that the information still exists in sections further down the page. The following rant will explain why this is the *right* way to lay out the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.72.142 (talk) 06:18, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

As a new watcher of Doctor Who, I'm only just beginning series 6. I'm massively careful about how I look for information online so as to avoid spoilers. But this article threw the spoilers in my face.

I came to this page simply to find out when River Song's character first appeared (because I only joined the series in the last few episodes of the Tenth Doctor's reign). I thought going straight to River's page would get me the information I needed as quickly as possible, without stumbling onto any information that might tip episodes that I haven't yet seen. In fact, the last episode I saw was 6.2, which left me with the tantalizing and wonderous mystery of the little girl - who is she, and why does she seem to be regenerating?! Alas, the first thing I see on River Song's page is the colourful box declaring "Also known as Melody Pond". Hmm... And if that wasn't enough of a giveaway (which it was), the introductory paragraph spills all the beans about River's parentage, removing all the mystery for good. Looks like I've just ruined the next season and a half of the show.

I'm all for compiling the world's greatest knowledge base. But can we do it with a bit of tact? I'm not going to be the only person in the world catching up on this show a few years late. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.72.142 (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is written from a real world perspective and as such years-old information is presented as-is. Also, see WP:SPOILER. DonQuixote (talk) 06:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

If you're the kind of person who enjoys not knowing stuff, an encyclopedia is your worst nightmare. Our mission is antagonistic to your wishes. --TS 09:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Very well. I have now read the pages on spoilers and lead sections. Although I still question the validity of the level of detail in the lead section, I will withdraw from this debate. Thank you Don Quixote for your courteous response. Thank you Tony Sidaway for your unyielding efforts to compile the world's most comprehensive knowledge base. 220.239.72.142 (talk) 08:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Categories: