This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CFredkin (talk | contribs) at 01:26, 8 November 2013 (→Newsmax: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:26, 8 November 2013 by CFredkin (talk | contribs) (→Newsmax: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Boo.
|
Trial and Tribulation |
| Enjoy your ANI.
Trick or Treat. SPECIFICO talk 04:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC) |
Many thanks
Many tanks for the heads up. I'll respond appropriately. X4n6 (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Topic ban.
I expect that you are watching the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WP:BLP violation at Ludwig von Mises Institute, but if you are not, the consensus of the community is that you are banned from engaging in any edits or interactions with respect to the article, Ludwig von Mises Institute. I wish you the best of editing in other areas of the encyclopedia. Please remember that you can't go wrong if you stick to clearly reliable sources. bd2412 T 01:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice. Does this topic ban have an expiration or a period after which I'm expected to request its conclusion? MilesMoney (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Since I'm just a closing administrator (and not ArbCom), you are free to request removal of the topic ban at any time at ANI; however, you will need to obtain a consensus in favor of such a removal. In practice, this is unlikely to occur absent a period of conduct on your part which creates a substantial impression that you will not revisit the practices that led to the topic ban in the first place. Cheers! bd2412 T 01:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Proud of you, young man
You comported yourself very well during your "trial", young man. Ironing your suits and tying your ties for you always made me gleam (it was mature of you to ditch the bow-tie to avoid the impression that you were making a statement against Murray). I know that Ms. User:SPECIFICO was happy to give you daily rides to court. We both thought you were particularly poised when that tough guy military prosecutor got in your face (I had to hid my eyes at that point, and luckily, Ms. SPECIFICO was up to the task. ;) ) And all things considered, the verdict -- no sanctions on 99.9% of libertarian WP pages -- ain't too bad. Steeletrap (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Some of the details still make no sense to me, such as the absence of a BLP violation, but any trial you can walk away from is a good one, I suppose. It's not the hanging that some would have paid to see, nor was it the exoneration that I deserved. MilesMoney (talk) 05:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Leave aside the absence of a BLP violation. None of your diffs of your alleged "misconduct" that the community based its decision on (with the possible exception of the closing admin) had anything to do with your edits to BLPs! Steeletrap (talk) 06:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- The more you explain it, the less sense it makes. MilesMoney (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Leave aside the absence of a BLP violation. None of your diffs of your alleged "misconduct" that the community based its decision on (with the possible exception of the closing admin) had anything to do with your edits to BLPs! Steeletrap (talk) 06:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Newsmax
Greetings. Your input is requested in the discussion at . Thank you.CFredkin (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)