This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nick-D (talk | contribs) at 07:52, 18 December 2013 (del). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:52, 18 December 2013 by Nick-D (talk | contribs) (del)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Ernest Rusch
- Ernest Rusch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notable only for being the recipient of a single second-level decoration. Generally, and backed up by WP:SOLDIER, it takes two second-level decorations to establish notability failing any other reason for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. One source that I saw isn't going to be enough to reach the notability guidelines so what happens if there is no notability? It gets deleted. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per Ashbeckjonathan Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)