This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juzumaru (talk | contribs) at 13:26, 25 December 2013 (→This edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:26, 25 December 2013 by Juzumaru (talk | contribs) (→This edit)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please stop deleting referenced material
We may have to rewrite the Korea Japan relation article
We may need to divide the article in 2 or 3 sections. One Koreas beliefs, 2 Japans beliefs and three National Geographics/US universities/NY Met musuem beliefs etc.
You reverting to a Japan POV article is probably not going to work with many people.--50.46.243.60 (talk) 08:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Don't hide the history of Korea conquered by the Mongol Empire.
Korea was able to attack Japan for the first time,As the slave of the Mongol Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.84.27.102 (talk) 12:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Your making too many mistakes with Japanese POV
The section that should be in controversy area should be the Japanese POV version. The Joint history project with experts from Japan and Korea which took 3 years concluded that most of the quotes were translated incorrectly or wrong. They stated that Japan did not have any colony in Korea during the Kofun period. Also the version that you are putting in, if you look at the references, they do not state what is being written in the article. Please double check the references before you revert back to old version. --4.23.83.100 (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know, since the experts from the 3 year study from Japan and Korea concluded there was no colony at this time, any insinuation that there was some sort of Japanese leadership in Korea will be moved to the controvesy section, just like you moved the other sections. Thanks --4.23.83.100 (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Your user page
Hi, Juzumaru. I advise you to create your user page whatever you like. A red-link user page tend to be regarded as a newbie to Misplaced Pages and easily reverted your edit. Also, you should enable your email account so that we can communicate offline. Thank you for your contributions.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- You don't enabled your email setting yet. It is important in case of emergency. Thanks.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Empire of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gojong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sino-Japanese War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Koreans in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lotte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1598, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Lin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of pasta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- long rice|dangmyeon]]'') and ] ('']'') , for example, are both of Chinese origin), as well as Southeast Asian countries such as ], the ], ], and [
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Mongol Empire.<ref name="SWOPE32">Swope. 2005. pp. 32.</ref><ref>]</ref>
- | title = 이치전투 (조선 역사)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Don't make a hoax
Your edit in the article Ōei Invasion is wrong. It's just one of the Chinese captives' statement who knows norhing about the expedition. There's much more formal information in the Chosun Annals. Don't make a hoax. --Leedkmn (talk) 03:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seven-Branched Sword, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jin Dynasty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited December 16, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Lin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited December 16, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Lin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to August 14 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 1598)|Imjin War]]: at the ], the Korean Navy, led by ] and , decisively defeats the Japanese Navy , led by ], at
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited December 16, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Lin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Magatama article section removal
You recently removed an entire section of the magatama article, a section that has numerous references. Please open a discussion on the talk page of the article before removing sourced content. Thanks, Prburley (talk) 20:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Battle of Busan
I notice you keep reverting the text on the Battle of Busan in List of naval battles. I'm not sure what your motivation is, and I am not going to question it, however your edits to this section only share the same point of view as one side of the debate in article on the Battle of Busan (1592), so I do not think they are appropriate for the List of naval battles page, but rather the talk page on the Battle of Busan (1592). I propose as a compromise then that the text on the Battle of Busan on the List of naval battles page just include the link to the main page, and those who are curious can judge for themselves. McMuff (talk) 20:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of assassinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Gojong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
About Japanese loss in Japan invasion of Korea
It seems you read lots of articles related this war. Can you find a source (Japanese sources, Korean sources, Chinese sources or English sources) and add a precise data about soldiers killed, wounded or other loss for Japanese side? The data about Korean and Chinese loss are very precise which include killed, wounded or captive. It is based on single digit. The Japanese loss is only a number which is very vague (100K+). No killed number, no wounded one.—Miracle dream (talk • contribs)
December 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Burkholderia denitrificans, you may be blocked from editing. Here you changed the island from what the source says to another island. I notice other unexplained edits making major changes in the meaning of texts. Dougweller (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
This edit
Don't add grammatical mistakes to other people's prose in order to make their edits look like poorly written Korean propaganda. Virtually all JAPANESE scholars either accept or recognize the theory that Okura was either a kikajin or toraijin who fled to Japan after the fall of Kudara. This is not a political issue (I don't know of any contemporary Korean nationalists who cling fondly to the theory that a Korean man as early as the 7th century loved Japanese civilization so much that he decided to express himself though waka rather than kanshi), so stop trying to make it so. Also, if you are curious about which scholars say what, please check the page history, and the sources already cited in the article. Thank you for your cooperation. 182.249.240.19 (talk) 15:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- まず、文献から該当分の引用をしてくださいな。検証のしようがないので。--Juzumaru (talk) 08:46, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
中西先生の「渡来人論」は一頁目から百済からの渡来人だと述べている。そういう題の論文だから。キーン先生の『日本文学史』ならすでにページを述べた。山上億良について詳しく書いた現代の資料はほとんどすべて渡来人論(帰化人論)を述べているよ。 182.249.240.1 (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- 「ボクが書いてあるって言うんだから、書いてあるんだもん。憶良は韓国人だもん。」じゃ議論になりませんよ。『新撰姓氏録』の山上氏についての記録を持ち出すとか、もう少し、なんとかできないんですか?--Juzumaru (talk) 13:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring
Please discuss further edits on the talk pages before adding contentious material. Your recent activity on the Empress Jingu and Yamanoue no Okura show an especially negative pattern. 182.249.240.38 (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.249.240.10 (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
Welcome!
Hello, Juzumaru, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! While efforts to improve Misplaced Pages are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Japanese; did you know there is a Japanese Misplaced Pages? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts!
ようこそ!
Juzumaruさん、はじめまして。英語版ウィキペディアへようこそ。英語版ウィキペディアへの投稿はいつでも歓迎いたしますが、残念ながら今回Juzumaruさんに執筆いただいた英文は英語版ウィキペディアの水準を満たしておりません。もしよろしければ、日本語版ウィキペディアの方へ投稿していただければ幸いです。ウィキペディア・プロジェクトへの参加ありがとうございます。 -- Ross HillTalk • Need Help? 17:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC)