User talk:Joshua Jonathan - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) at 17:32, 11 January 2014 (→Do you know?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:32, 11 January 2014 by Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) (→Do you know?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Edit Request on Patanjali

In the lead of the Yoga page, there is way too much emphasis on the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. Indeed, the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali don't need to be mentioned at all. Please eliminate Yoga Sutras of Patanjali in lead. 176.67.169.207 (talk) 03:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Copied to Talk:Yoga#Edit Request on Patanjali

New pages

You think there should be following pages?

Like we got

Hindu views on monotheism . Bladesmulti (talk) 14:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

My first thought is, "No"; too specific. At second thought, it might be of interest to some. "Hindu views on monotheism" has been visited 1814 times in the last 30 days, so it might be of interest. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Navbox Zen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Navbox Zen. Since you had some involvement with the Navbox Zen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg 14:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit summary

Movement, but not removement. Rather: removal.CorinneSD (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

See Talk:Indo-Aryan migration theories

See Aryan Migration talk. 176.67.169.146 (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

You should clearly do about something, we shall remember once again, that Aryan theory is no more accepted by people, since about 1940s. And things like "fusion of aryan and dravidian culture" on lead may disagreements and edit war, like the current one we are having. One was previously by "yoondaue"(something). If you remember. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

"Aryan migration theory" is common scholarly understanding. And the "fusion" too. I think it's properly sourced. Yoonadue is a clear example of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Surat

If you have time, would you look at the most recent edits to Surat? One editor added a date, first with AD, then changing it to CE. It is missing the word "in" before the year. I was going to add "in", but before I did so, I thought I'd ask you to be sure that the date is correct. Another editor just before that added a www website for "movers and packers in Surat". I thought that might be an attempt to add a website to a business so as to get a little free advertising, but I wasn't sure.CorinneSD (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Honestly, I've no idea if the date is correct, but it looks like a GFE to me. The "movers and packers" have been self-reverted already. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

2 Edit Requests on HINDUISM page

1. Add Buddhism as one of the explicit roots of Hinduism. 2. Add this reference to the lead:

Inden, Ronald. "Ritual, Authority, And Cycle Time in Hindu Kingship." In JF Richards, ed., Kingship and Authority in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998, p.67, 55 "before the eighth century, the Buddha was accorded the position of universal deity and ceremonies by which a king attained to imperial status were elaborate donative ceremonies entailing gifts to Buddhist monks and the installation of a symbolic Buddha in a stupa....This pattern changed in the eighth century. The Buddha was replaced as the supreme, imperial deity by one of the Hindu gods (except under the Palas of eastern India, the Buddha's homeland)...Previously the Buddha had been accorded imperial-style worship (puja). Now as one of the Hindu gods replaced the Buddha at the imperial centre and pinnacle of the cosmo-political system, the image or symbol of the Hindu god comes to be housed in a monumental temple and given increasingly elaborate imperial-style puja worship."

VictoriaGrayson (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Victoria. Thank you very much for this source! Most welcome. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

No Western Academic book uses genetics to justify Aryan Migration

No western academic book uses genetics to justify Aryan Migration. Please delete the entire section. 176.67.169.146 (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

B. S. Ahloowalia (2009), Invasion of the Genes. Genetic Heritage of India. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

You give third opinion

For related subjects? Bladesmulti (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Share opinion, here Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Slavic Vedism Bladesmulti (talk) 03:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

You're sure? I noticed the message at your Talk page, but thought it best to stay out. I'll have a second look, though. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

I know, some unwanted conflict, because you suggest that a person is "wp:stalking" that can be suspicious, never knew that before either way. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

I refrained therefo from commenting, being a "Talk page stalker" already. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Indeed. Some of the circumstances are untold here, I avoid ban as much as i can though, few times it's uncertain what next one is doing. Now right now we got only one issue, and that's with the aryan migration theory, if that IP guy can present some special proof like he has told before, it may help a lot.. Do you also think that Rahul Jain will never put a end to the 2500 years old debate? I pretty much think so.. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Criticism of Jainism". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 09:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Rahul (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Very nice work on Slavic Vedism, in terms of citations and content. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm surprised, though; it may not exactly be what you expected. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Do you know?

That Muhammad was written down at least 120 years later? Bladesmulti (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Anyways, my point behind telling this ^^ was to inform, that writing anything like.... "buddha was written down 400 years later" on the lead, is actually essential? If so, why you think so? It's probably other editor who wrote it, I think. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)