This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Manul (talk | contribs) at 22:21, 22 January 2014 (→WP:COPYVIO). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:21, 22 January 2014 by Manul (talk | contribs) (→WP:COPYVIO)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)That quote
Apologies, I've been busy and it slipped my mind, however I did ask another Administrator who is very clued up on copyvio and she agrees that it is too long. She suggests doing some paraphrase (read WP:Close paraphrase and because of the copyvio (and the fact another editor has reverted you), I'm afraid you'll have to do this. Dougweller (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
WP:COPYVIO
Please read this policy. Do not add copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages unless it is a direct quote with attribution. vzaak 22:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, as I already said, I actually did change the wording. Read both the WP and the quoted article and find the differences. But if you think you can do a better job without distorting the sense of these important statements, go ahead. But stop deleting without reason and thereby destroying the context! Greetings,--Der Spion (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
This is plagiarism:
- there was no way that any of the functions including vision, hearing, emotion, memory, language, or logic could possibly have been intact
- only isolated pockets of deep cortical neurons were still sputtering, yet no broad networks capable of generating anything like what we call “consciousness”
The former is exactly the same as the source, and the latter's only change is "but" to "yet". Do not plagiarize. Final warning. vzaak 22:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)