This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RetroAuth (talk | contribs) at 10:54, 24 January 2014 (→Sutherland v. Stopes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:54, 24 January 2014 by RetroAuth (talk | contribs) (→Sutherland v. Stopes)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article, Halliday Sutherland, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
Halliday Gibson Sutherland was born in Glasgow on 24th June 1882. He was educated at Glasgow High School and Merchiston Castle School.
In 1920 he married Muriel Fitzpatrick. They had six children and lived at 5 Stafford Terrace, Kensington in London.
Medical Career
Books
Sutherland wrote a number of books and articles over his career, some of which are listed below. The Arches of the Years published in 1932 was the most successful in commercial terms. It was the ninth bestseller in the United States in 1933 in the Publisher's Weekly list and eventually ran to 35 editions in English and was translated into eight languages.
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis in General Practice (1916)
- Birth Control: The Arches of the Years (1932)
- A Time to Keep (1934)
- Laws of Life (1935)
- In My Path (1936)
- Tuberculin Handbook (1936)
- Lapland Journey (1938)
- Hebridean Journey (1939)
- Southward Journey (1942)
- Control of Life (1944)
- Spanish Journey (1948)
- Irish Journey (1956)
Irish Journey included Dr Sutherland's account of his visit to the Magdalene Laundry in Galway in April 1955.
Sutherland v. Stopes
In 1922 Sutherland wrote Birth Control. In it, he quoted a letter from Marie Stopes to the Sussex Daily News (published on 17th November). He emphasised the part which read: "That there may be medical men who do not approve of birth control is natural, when one remembers that a doctor has to make his living, and can do so more easily when women are ailing with incessant pregnancies than when they maintain themselves in good health by only having children when fitted to do so. Opinions of medicals, therefore, must be sifted. The best doctors are with us; the self-seeking and the biased may be against us". Sutherland described it as a "malignant attack" on the medical profession.
Later, under the heading "Exposing the Poor to Experiment", he wrote: "In the midst of a London slum a woman, who is a doctor of German philosophy (Munich), has opened a Birth Control Clinic, where working women are instructed in a method of contraception described by Professor McIlroy as "The most harmful method of which I have had experience". When we remember that that millions are being spent by the Ministry of Health and by Local Authorities - on pure milk for necessitous expectant and nursing mothers, on Maternity Clinics to guard the health of mothers before and after childbirth, for the provision of skilled midvives, and on Infant Welfare Centres - it is truly amazing that this monstrous campaign of birth control should be tolerated by the Home Secretary. Charles Bradlaugh was condemned to jail for a less serious crime." It was this statement that was actionable and became the subject of the Sutherland v. Stopes libel case.
In a modern context, the dispute is seen as a pro and anti contraception. For instance, the Misplaced Pages article for Marie Stopes states: "In 1922 a Roman Catholic doctor, Halliday Gibson Sutherland, wrote a book called Birth Control. In it, he attacked Stopes over her advocacy of the cervical cap." This statement limits the true breadth of the ideological struggle taking place. At the time, the clash was between the advocates and opponents of the then fashionable doctrine of Eugenics (Stopes letter to the Sussex Daily News was signed as the "President of the Society for Constructive and Racial Progress"). The full title of Sutherland's book was Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine against the Neo-Malthusians.
The case went through the courts. The House of Lords, then the highest court applying to Britain, decided in Sutherland's (and another unnamed defendant's) favour.
References
- British Medical Journal, Obituary Halliday G Sutherland, M.D. April 30, 1960 pages 1368-9
- Halliday Sutherland, Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine against the Neo-Malthusians
- Harley Williams, 'Sutherland, Halliday Gibson (1882-1960)',rev.Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press 2004.
- Michael Korda, Making the List: A Cultural History of the American Bestseller 1900-1999, Barnes and Noble 2001. ISBN 0-7607-2559-4.
- The Tablet Saturday November 29, 1924
- Misplaced Pages article on Marie Stopes