This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cirt (talk | contribs) at 18:14, 1 February 2014 (→Invites and advice: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:14, 1 February 2014 by Cirt (talk | contribs) (→Invites and advice: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This is Cirt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
| WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Misplaced Pages. | |
|
|
| Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list | edit | |
Centralized discussion
|
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
| ||||||||||
GAR possibly of interest
As someone who took an interest in Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)/archive2, you may have an interest in Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Freedom from Want (painting)/1. Eventually, I plan to pursue a WP:GTC or WP:FTC, but one of the articles in the set is currently controversial.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notification, a bit busy at the moment but will try to have a look soon. — Cirt (talk) 07:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Fuck peer review, again
- Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
- Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Social sciences and society reviews redux
I will review these articles currently nominated at WP:GAN as WP:GA candidates. — Cirt (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Update: Image reviews posted to both. — Cirt (talk) 17:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Added Stability review for each. — Cirt (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Passed Accounting research as GA. — Cirt (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Voluntary disclosure placed as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Passed Accounting research as GA. — Cirt (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Added Stability review for each. — Cirt (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
4th
- Thanks for your work on the 4th Amendment. With a little work, I think it could make it to FA. --HectorMoffet (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- You're most welcome, HectorMoffet, — Cirt (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work on the 4th Amendment. With a little work, I think it could make it to FA. --HectorMoffet (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Dan Savage bibliography for FLC
I've gone ahead and nominated Dan Savage bibliography for WP:FLC consideration, the discussion page is at Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/Dan Savage bibliography/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Notice of posting to TFA nominations
I've added Fuck (film) to TFA nominations, discussion is at Misplaced Pages:Today's_featured_article/requests#Fuck_.28film.29. — Cirt (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Articles to review for social sciences and society
I will review these articles currently nominated at WP:GAN as WP:GA candidates. — Cirt (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Update: Posted Stability review, for both. — Cirt (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Completed Image Review for Earnings management. Image review pending for The Accounting Review. — Cirt (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Update: Passed Earnings management as GA. — Cirt (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- The Accounting Review placed as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Update: Passed Earnings management as GA. — Cirt (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Completed Image Review for Earnings management. Image review pending for The Accounting Review. — Cirt (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
GA reviews
Hey Cirt, thanks for the reviews! I'm a little busy these few days, but I'll try my best to respond to and make changes regarding the issues you've raised. --Well-rested 21:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- No problems, Well-rested, like I said, as long as I see you're making some good progress towards good article quality, that's a good thing. Keep me posted, — Cirt (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Noel Coward Allan warren edit 1.jpg
I found a problem with this; could you please review and see if you A. agree there's an error, and B. if you do agree, if you find the edit sufficient to fix it? Adam Cuerden 01:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Done. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 01:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Invites and advice
- Thanks for the invite! Definitely up my alley.
- If you get a chance, you might look over my nominations to DYK, see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Mass surveillance#New articles. I'm doing my best to submit 100% neutral hooks, but I'm a newbie to mainpage, and need all the oversight I can get.
- Additionally, I'm looking at putting a lot of time into articles over the next week-- please advise me on where I should focus my efforts! --HectorMoffet (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome, HectorMoffet, my pleasure. I don't really participate at DYK anymore these days, but I can take a look at the articles themselves and see if I have any advice for you to help you further along the quality improvement process. — Cirt (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)