This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Edicius (talk | contribs) at 19:48, 19 June 2006 (please respond to me!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:48, 19 June 2006 by Edicius (talk | contribs) (please respond to me!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Template:FACfailed is deprecated, and is preserved only for historical reasons. Please see Template:Article history instead. |
 | This article (or a previous version) is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination did not succeed. For older candidates, please check the Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations. |
New discussion
I want to start a new discussion about this article. I want to say thank you to all those Wikipedians who contributed to this article. This article is pretty interesting. After reading it, I am strongly against social promotion. There seems to be more reasons against social promotion than for. Anyone agree? What do you think about this article? Would you promote your child if he/she was behind? I know I wouldn't. It's just wrong. I can't believe that the school I went to supported social promotion. Do you guys think that I should say something to the school district? That would be so cool...I'll be like making a difference...like Rosa Parks when she stood up for her right...After all it is a controversial topic. So please comment on what you think. I would appreciate it if you comment on this page rather than on my page. It would be a lot easier for everyone to read. thanks! ♥ Edicius
Category: