Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tkuvho (talk | contribs) at 15:04, 13 February 2014 (→Your misrepresentation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Israel". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  02:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Dispute resolution

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Precision123 (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Your misrepresentation

Your edit summary Undid revision 595294184 by Tkuvho (talk) but it was already removed and a talk page section was opened is a misrepresentation of the sequence of events. It is not correct that the material was removed and then a talk page section opened concerning this issue. In fact, there is an old section on an unrelated issue that contains a comment by User:Ronz opposing the inclusion of this material. Note that the material you removed has been there for over a week with the consensus of the active editors. Several tendentious editors have already been reported and so will you if you continue misrepresenting other editors' actions. Tkuvho (talk) 14:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

My misrepresentation ? What a utterly stupid thing to say. I am used to people coming to my page and talking shit but if you think 11 February 2014 is old there is nothing I can do for you. I am not tendentious editor but I am someone that you shouldn't threaten if you would like to continue editing in the topic area. Sean.hoyland - talk 15:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

I suggest you apologize for your obscene language. Tkuvho (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)