Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mthinkcpp

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mthinkcpp (talk | contribs) at 09:11, 22 February 2014 (Prefer not to engage directly with IP, as has done two WP:PA (against me - when I engage) and addresses users in third person). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:11, 22 February 2014 by Mthinkcpp (talk | contribs) (Prefer not to engage directly with IP, as has done two WP:PA (against me - when I engage) and addresses users in third person)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2


IP repeatedly doing revoked edits

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

IP 84.127.80.114 on the Debian page is repeatedly doing edits that have been revoked 3+ times. 84.127.80.114 also accuses those (several users) who revoke the edits of vandalism. Could the IP be blocked from editing the Debian page? mthinkcpp (talk) 09:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Also see Talk:Debian. mthinkcpp (talk)

I have given the editor a talk page warning about edit warring, and about using Misplaced Pages for campaigning. Only under very exceptional circumstances is it appropriate to block a user who has not first received clear explanation as to what is wrong with their editing, and given a chance to take that on board and adjust their editing accordingly. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank-you mthinkcpp (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The editor is planning (Talk:Debian, latest post) to reinstate the edits one by one, presumably in the view that this does not violate the warning. Can this be avoided? mthinkcpp (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C++, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proprietary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)