Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk | contribs) at 19:21, 27 February 2014 (3RR warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi welcome to wikipedia Rahibsaleem (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Rahibsaleem! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Your recent editing history at Jews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 19:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring warning

Your recent editing history at Jews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Your proposed addition has been disputed by multiple editors. Absent an active violation of a central policy like BLP, you need to establish consensus for its inclusion. When, as here, the dispute is over the prominence to be given to the material in dispute, rather than its inclusion per se, edit warring in the absence of consensus is particularly inappropriate. Making personal attacks on editors who disagree with you, on the article talk page or elsewhere, is clearly improper, and may also lead to suspension of your editing privileges. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)