This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OccultZone (talk | contribs) at 19:15, 9 March 2014 (→Requested move: sup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:15, 9 March 2014 by OccultZone (talk | contribs) (→Requested move: sup)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian Century article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Indian Century
Indian century is as common a term as Chinese century is so why some users r objecting against making this pageLAKSJD1 21:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
India is often called the next big superpower it has a thriving economy, third largest military, large land area, large population, nukes, stable and democratic government etc. LAKSJD1 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKSJD1 (talk • contribs)
Do we really need a neologism for a possibility? In fact, does it make sense to create an encyclopedia article on a personal/non-scientific hypothesis? If it was a movement, or an ideology, it might have made sense to document it, but this is not that either. I'm pretty sure the British and American centuries were named in hindsight, not as a prophecies. Y not math (talk) 20:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Y not math (talk) 01:51, 27 July 2012 (IST)
Notable?
Well, actually to discuss whether or not this article is remarkable. One should not pursue this edit war. Those who are opposed to present their arguments.
Start the discussion, but do not know if I will continue with it ... My available time is limited. Hallel (talk) 19:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- The concept appears at first glance to be quite notable Three academic books just on a cursory search. Facts, not fiction (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
this page shows what is a concept and thus it should be there, not deleted. --117.194.200.168 (talk) 11:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
AfD
The article has been nominated for deletion as it fails WP:GNG and has several issues. Mar4d (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Complicado editar com quem força WP:POINT. Desisto do artigo! Hallel (talk) 13:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
The request to rename this article to Indian Century has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Indian century → Indian Century – For consistency with American Century, Asian Century and Chinese Century. Charles Essie (talk) 21:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support It's not about the "century" equivalent in some Indian timekeeping method. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 00:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Per 70.50.151.11. OccultZone (Talk) 19:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Unassessed International relations articles
- Unknown-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Unassessed WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Requested moves