Misplaced Pages

User talk:C Colden

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cydebot (talk | contribs) at 02:35, 22 June 2006 (Robot - Fixing cross-namespace redirects using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:35, 22 June 2006 by Cydebot (talk | contribs) (Robot - Fixing cross-namespace redirects using AWB)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome to the Misplaced Pages

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Misplaced Pages:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam 15:01, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Herschelkrustofsky, C Colden and 64.30.208.48

After complaints to the Arbitration Committee Herschelkrustofsky, C Colden and 64.30.208.48 are banned for one week for violation of the provisions of Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Lyndon_LaRouche/Proposed_decision#Edit_wars_or_re-insertion_of_original_material. Effective November 25, 2004 on the vote of 5 arbitrators conducted at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested.

Schiller Institute

If you can source that Wills and Fourcade were there, by all means put it in. All I ask is that material be properly sourced. You are insane if you call my edit vandalism, and I mean that very sincerely and in the literal sense. I added just one sentence in the intro: that its critics regard the Institute as a political cult. In fact, that is more than fair, because it is so regarded by most people, not just its critics. I also moved your "history" to the end and recalled it "conferences" because it wasn't the history of the Institute, or anywhere near it. Stop your propaganda efforts or I will go back to the ArbCom and will formally request that they kick you out of Misplaced Pages or ask you to stop editing LaRouche articles, which would amount to the same thing because that's all you ever do. You shouldn't have anything to do with Misplaced Pages. Have you noticed that ALL your edits cause trouble? You are a poisonous troll. Slim 19:31, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

I'll say it again -- your childish personal attacks do not enhance your credibility. --Caroline 17:16, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

READ these

Below are the principles and policies that all editors — including those editors, like yourself, who support or work for Lyndon LaRouche — must adhere to, with no exceptions.

Regarding novel narratives involving a new synthesis of information: "An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonetheless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Misplaced Pages's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one," Jimbo Wales (WikiEN-l, Dec 6, 2004)

User accounts

A request was recently made to the developers regarding the relationship, if any, between the user accounts User:Herschelkrustofsky, User:Weed Harper and User:C Colden. The reply from the developers is: "On technical evidence, combined with similarity in posting patterns, Herschelkrustofsky and Weed Harper can be considered to be operated by the same person. C Colden is either the same person or working in coordination with them, but is not *firmly* established to be the same person." I've been advised that the correct thing to do is to ask you if you can shed light on your relationship with the other user accounts. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 01:16, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

La Rouche arbitration

The La Rouche arbitration part two has been accepted; temporary injunctions have been proposed which would affect your editing of La Rouche related articles; please made any comments at the talk page of Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Lyndon_LaRouche_Part_Deux/Proposed_decision#Proposed_temporary_injunctions. Fred Bauder 15:54, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee injunction

Pending a final decision on the case concerning you, you are prohibited from editing articles on Template:LaRouche, editing the talk pages on Template:LaRouche Talk creating new articles related to the LaRouche movement or adding LaRouche-related material to other articles pending resolution of this matter. Violation of this injunction will result in a block of up to twenty-four hours. Pages relating to the case are not included. Please see the injunction order for details. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 04:03, 2005 Jan 27 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche 2

The arbitration committee has amended this case to add a new remedy. Herschelkrustofsky is now banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one year. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 19:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)