Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bazaan (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 13 March 2014 (→Mind you,: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you don't mind, I prefer to respond to your talk page

You can, if you prefer, send me an e-Mail

State of mind

Read before you write My comments on Misplaced Pages are works in progress subject to the Thread-mode Disclaimer. I am always on editor review. You are welcome to comment on my edits there. I do make mistakes, plenty of them. Please, assume good faith. Otherwise, I sincerely don't give a fuck.

Archives Discussion tracker User talk Article talk Misplaced Pages talk

two questions

Isn't it standard procedure to put Template:Delrev on the deleted/deletable page as described by WP:DRV instructions? I found the edit summary a bit derogatory. Are image discussions and actions supposed to be inherently rude? Aditya 01:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

{{delrev}} is usually used only for pages which have a keep decision appealed or which are restored during a DRV so that people can see the previous content. Image description pages without an actual image to correspond to them are deleted as a general standard. As for the description, it's taken directly from the deletion dropdown. Stifle (talk) 09:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:70.128.184.187

Thanks for the note. I put the article on my watch list and will take care of it if it happens again. If I'm not around, you can report it to WP:AIV, since the IP has received a final warning. Cheers.--Kubigula (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Catsuits and bodysuits in popular media

Please point to the particular scene, line, or critical commentary which says that a particular catsuit was made of lycra, leather, pleather, or whatever. Corvus cornix_talk 06:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

If you don't like the material (leather/latex/vinyl) to be there without a citation, then remove them I thought about that but figured I'd get reverted. Corvus cornix_talk 17:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

wardrobe malfunction

I'll give you Social aspects of clothing and to a lesser extent Voyeurism (though I highly disagree with this one as well), but how do you explain Wedgie, Whale tail, Downblouse and Upskirt, when none of these subjects involve a "defect" in an article of clothing or accidental exposure of one's body part? These all imply either a deliberate exposure or simply the visual effect of an article of clothing - not a result in an exposure due to a defect. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 08:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

In context, now I can see how those terms apply with the expansion you've given to the article. Though on a personal level I still disagree. There is obviously a big difference in a defect in an article of clothing and an intentional display, but ...whatever. Nice job so far. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 19:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. :) The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 01:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Greater India

It would be better if you could discuss and go through the concerned article's history () before making such edits. Thanks --Nosedown (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I clearly mentioned in the edit summary that the gallery was imported to, and not from, Indianized kingdom. The gallery should be removed from the article on Indianized kingdom since not all images in this gallery are linked to the concerned topic. In other words, these images are more relevant to the Greater India article. And I apologize for the removal of the "Evolution of the term". That was done by mistake. --Nosedown (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Good job. The article is in much better shape now. Cheers --Nosedown (talk) 17:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

South Asia

My political affiliations, grudges etc are not relenvant here, it's just a matter of simple english reading skills:

this is what the sentence reads:

"It also encompasses the 562 protected princely states that became integral parts of the Union of India, but was not directly ruled by the Raj, including Hyderabad State, Kingdom of Mysore, State of Jammu and Kashmir, Baroda, and Gwalior. Sikkim joined India in 1975"

The sentence is constructed (assuming good faith) so as to imply that Jammu and kashmir is an integral part of India along with the other mentioned states, this is obviously not true, so the sentence needs to be correctly rephrased. Khokhar (talk) 21:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments on my talk page, I would be happy to lend a hand, but I am not always very active so will try to help whenever possible. Regards. Khokhar (talk) 19:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Silk Smitha

Hi Aditya Kabir. I have tried to revert the above-captioned article to the last clean version. I may have inadvertently taken out this edit of yours. Please feel free to restore that edit if I did indeed err. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 07:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Illegal immigration in India

Hi,

I have somewhat enhanced the article Illegal immigration in India. Please review and comment on the talk page if the NPOV banner can be removed.

Thanks --Iball (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I replied to your comments in the talk page. Please check. --Iball (talk) 07:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

A-Class review

Hi,

Yes, you are right an A-Class should be decided by the relevant wikiproject. I was wondering how did the members of your project go about this and reached the decision for this article Talk:Shahbag to pass it as an A-Class article? I cannot see any discussions about this. Mootros (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Email

The problem is I have a 15 page honors thesis to write between now and May 5th, and then I have finals. I am technically supposed to be on wikibreak these days. I can't really be of much use until after 5/15, but it is quite clear that they are on the road to getting banned. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Tibet on South Asia

Quigley seems to want to start a discussion on the inclusion of Tibet in South Asia. Please chime in if you can. You are being informed of this as you took part in similar discussions on Talk:South Asia in the past. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 08:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Bambusa vulgaris

Hi Aditya Kabir, I have not forgotten about helping with the B. vulgaris article. I am currently working on a large list of disambiguations and when I am finished will take another look at it. It does need some work, but can see you have striven mightily to be thorough. As for rating it a "B", I would leave that to members of WikiProject Plants, although there is no prohibition from you rating it yourself, as far as I know. After all, WP is the encyclopedia anyone can edit.

One tip: all mentions of species' scientific names in the article should be in italics, without exception; this includes the genus and the specific epithet, whether written out completely, or abbreviated. To whit: B. vulgaris, Bambusa vulgaris. All levels above the level of genus are never italicized, so they can always be left alone.

I promise to get back to it, but it may be some time late this coming week. In the interim, if you want you can post to the WikiProject talk page, and see if a botanist will also lend some expert help. Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I made some edits to the article, see what you think - you have been doing a great job with it! I like it a lot, and it was most needed (common bamboo without an article for this long? Amazing!). One thing, I put in a lot of synonyms, but you show B. surinamensis as a synon. If it is indeed a synon, we need to place it in its proper place in the taxobox, and it needs to have a ref placed in the synonyms_ref entry section of the taxobox. I imagine it is one of the books you have cited where you found it. Forget that last part, I see it was one of the ones I added from Tropicos :) Thanks! Hamamelis (talk) 18:21, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

South Asia

This RFC seems to be getting responses only from IPs... can you recruit an expert to clarify this? or maybe a notification on a relevant noticeboard to attract some comments? --lTopGunl (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

im osrry

thanks for your kind words but i cant take it here. too stressful, now i am told i dont count at all and i know too many people on here are making it look like they want it too and this site isnt objective at all, and we cant do anything about it. Bouket (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Perianth (plant)

Just for your information — there's no need to tag the talk page for speedy deletion. Talk pages are supposed to be deleted when their articles are deleted, so I would have deleted the talk page immediately after deleting the article even if you'd not tagged it. Nyttend (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Bambusa vulgaris

Hi Aditya,

I'm really hard pressed for time. Not able to find enough time to address my various arguments, including with you. :) So my contribution to your quest is to provide a section missing vide Plant MOS - Description. However the urls are barebones and you will need to cloak them with cite webs. Ask for help in general WikiProjects Plants and India. You may like to ask User:Shyamal too for his opinion. Sorry cant help more at this stage. Hope it helps. Will pay more attention later when I'm free. AshLin (talk) 14:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps you did not notice in the taxobox that arundinacea is a synonym for vulgaris? See ref three of the article. The redirect "arundinacea" goes to "bambos" which is also without reference. Vide ref 3 both are in fact synonyms of "B. vulgaris". Please restore my description. AshLin (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Recommend you reflect the concern on talk page of WikiProject Plants where the experts reside. AshLin (talk) 14:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Peer review limits changed

This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at Misplaced Pages:Peer review. Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, the backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review.

While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request.

If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Misplaced Pages talk:Peer review. If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>° 01:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply

Hi! Update in Talk:Gauḍa region. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I have replied on Talk:Gauḍa region page. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Help: History of Bengal Template

Hi, hope all is well. This User:Kmzayeem keeps changing History of Bengal template to History of Bangladesh. As seen here and here. Please help stop this vandalism. Thank you (69.112.76.243 (talk) 00:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC))

My signature!

This is code of my signature
<font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ED791A 0em 0em 0.8em,#F55220 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">] ]
I tried to add CSS type effect. More specifically I tried to make it like Indian flag (above saffron blue links (name, talk) and green below), but I know it does not look like that! --Tito Dutta ✉ 01:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Replied in my talk page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 04:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Belflower1997

I know you moved the Bette Davis pic on this user's talk page to fix some formatting issues. As a courtesy I just wanted to let you know that I have subsequently adjusted the Bette Davis pic to more closely resemble my original placement of it there. My intention was not for the pic to bookmark the entire June 2012 Notices section but for this user to notice and know that their ongoing editing practices (no references, no edit summaries, clogging up edit histories with incremental edits) are against accepted Misplaced Pages practices and guidelines - I sometimes use images with my notes to editors that are in the their interest-range (& that are also not one of the usual WP Notice/Warning logos). Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation page!

"Work in progress" above in your talk page is a disambiguation page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 04:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. It's fixed now. The original link was not a disambig page. But, over the time it changed, and I didn't notice. Aditya 02:40, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

-_-

Why did you bother leaving me messages when I don't even log in anymore? BTW, I blanked my page without reading. Should of done this before. ★Dasani★ 01:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Nelson (author)

The article Andrew Nelson (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable references on anything except he wrote a few pieces for Salon.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 00:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Bangla Rock

The page Bangla rock was full of partial information, I have entered some facts there but still it needs more information especially about Bangladesh. Please go through the Talk page there. - Kmzayeem (talk) 16:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Something wrong with my IP

My IP has been blocked. But, I am a long standing registered editor. I don't know what to do. Please, advice. BTW, I am in the middle of two or three projects, including a potential FAC. A quick solution would be very helpful. Aditya 09:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

You'll have to give us the whole message you are getting. I can't see a block on your account, but you may have been caught in a range block or something. Peridon (talk) 10:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I've removed the unblock template, you need to use {{Unblock-auto}} and fill in the details otherwise nothing can be done--Jac16888 18:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

The block message says:

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you believe you are not running an open proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer from your ISP who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. If this is the case, please request to be unblocked using the {{unblock}} template, or request administrator attention using {{admin!}} and indicate you are caught by an open proxy block. More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). In some cases, this can be remedied by logging into the secure server. For more information, see the Wikiproject on Open Proxies and Misplaced Pages:Open proxies. (Sandbox test edit)

Does this help?

Here is the unblock-auto template:

Aditya Kabir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

115.127.20.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you believe you are not running an open proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer from your ISP who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. If this is the case, please request to be unblocked using the {{unblock}} template, or request administrator attention using {{admin!}} and indicate you are caught by an open proxy block. More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). In some cases, this can be remedied by logging into the secure server. For more information, see the Wikiproject on Open Proxies and Misplaced Pages:Open proxies.

• Blocking administrator: ProcseeBot (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I can confirm that this is an open proxy. (I have successfully logged onto it myself.) If you are trying to edit Misplaced Pages via an open proxy then you need to stop doing so and edit directly instead. If you are not trying to edit via a proxy then it is possible that your computer has been compromised and is being used as a Zombie server, in which case you should get your computer checked for viruses and trojans as soon as possible. In either case, the IP address must remain blocked as long as it is running an open proxy. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Please, advice. Aditya 04:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

So, do I remain blocked? Or is there something I can do? BTW, this net connection was provided to me by office. So, please, advice. Aditya 11:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Alright. They managed to change the IP I guess. Aditya 14:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Please rephrase your rude comment on a blocked user

Hi, I had welcomed this user and his talkpage was on my watch. I see that the new user had made some not so perfect edits on article(s) and may be had even shown some arrogance after which he was blocked. But Please understand that comments such as this will only fire up the situation, and is a good example of WP:BITE. That comment in my opinion is unnecessary, rude and inciting. Please rephrase it in a kind way.
Please be kind to others in the same way as you expect from others on your User_talk:Aditya_Kabir/Editnotice, cheers--DBigXray 21:32, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Sure. Thanks. Aditya 04:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Glad that you considered my advise.--DBigXray 05:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Extreme irritation, I guess. I have been seeing the same amount of stubborn non-reason quite a bit around the Misplaced Pages, often together with extreme incompetence/laziness. Stuff like that can really gets to you at times. Aditya 05:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

But you cannot fight arrogance with arrogance, my friend. Admins are always there if issues get out of hand. --DBigXray 05:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

True. Aditya 10:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Re : For god's sake

It's been quite a few months since I made the edits in Template:Bengal Renaissance and those had been undone long before you posted this thread. Please don't make unnecessary or belated complains. As for the Template:Tourism in Bangladesh, you can give your valuable advice on the talk page of the template, my user talk page is not the only place where you can negotiate. Some of your threads in my talk page are repeatedly violating the Misplaced Pages policies such as Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks, Misplaced Pages:Civility, Misplaced Pages:Harassment etc. Since you are an experienced editor here, I'm not reminding the negative results of these violations, thanks. --Kmzayeem (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: If you see it that way, I'll rather leave you to the community and the policies. Which, if you don't change your ways, will bring you more trouble.

I've already changed the way which I adopted initially but it seems it's your turn now since you are making redundant and belated complains which is severely annoying. My last edit in Template:Bengal Renaissance was on 4 May 2012 and it had been undone on 17 June 2012, more than a month before you posted the thread regarding this on ‎31 July 2012, see here. You have done a similar thing regarding the Template:History of Bengal. I admit I have committed some mistakes but bringing those past issues repeatedly can be termed as a severe violation of Civility. Besides, your metaphorical comments indicating me can be termed as harassment. Please don't post any philosophical comments or advice other than the technical issues. Your such behavior can discourage the relatively new users to edit here and ultimately damage the work of building an encyclopedia which will bring you the same trouble that you warned me. Hope you will abide by the policies. Please don't reply in my talk page. --Kmzayeem (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

New user

Hi. I guess this message from Frankfurt55 was intented for you. Cheers, Dodoïste (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Self published source

As you are active in Military history articles, feel free to remove WP:SPS pakdef.info from wiki articles, that you come across. The WP:RSN discussion is here, Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_108#Pakdef.info cheers--DBigXray 21:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ursula Andress in bikini.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ursula Andress in bikini.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

WP:REX#Verification of reliability

Dear Aditya! Is your request still open? Please let me know. Thank you, -- Doc Taxon (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

So you need all the 8 references stated there? -- Doc Taxon (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Jenny Van Tassel

I am a niece of Jenny Van Tassel---and a very old lady myself. Family does not believe she was ever married to Van Tassel, nor did she have a daughter. Old Van Tassel was a huckster. The picture you use of Jenny was furnished by the family about 1985. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.100.214.158 (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

sorry ji i didnt realise

you or i can remove the unstantiated information i added

also the info i removed may have been incorrect — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raam2012 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Title of 2013 Bangladesh riots

I just saw that you changed the title of 2013 Bangladesh violence after ICT verdicts to 2013 Bangladesh riots. I understand the title should be more compact, however the title 2013 Bangladesh riots is very general. I would request you to suggest a more specific name if you do not like the title: 2013 Bangladesh violence after ICT verdicts. Thanks.Pratanu.roy (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Actually, there is already a thread named 'Changing the title' in the talk page. Pratanu.roy (talk) 07:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Can the article 2013 Bangladesh riots be merged with the broader article of 2013 Bangladesh protests which mentions both shahbag protest and the later violent counter protest. The section on Shahbag forks out and later if/when the info in the counter protest section gets too large, we can fork out another article. However at the present moment because of the length of the 2013 Bangladesh riots, I would suggest a merge with 2013 Bangladesh protests. also few images on the violent counter protest would be quite informative for audiences and would enrich the article. LegalEagle (talk) 10:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

As far I can see, Bangladesh protests can work as a mother article, while specific separate events can have separate articles, i.e. the Riots and Shahbag. Aditya 04:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

1971 Bangladesh atrocities

You recently comment on a RM on the article 1971 Bangladesh atrocities. The discussion was closed and the article moved to the previous title by another editor per WP:RM/TR. A new RM has been initiated and can be found here Darkness Shines (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary wikipedia article

Hello Aditya, I have been given the article Sundarbans South Wildlife Sanctuary to 'Wikify', and I have found the large Sundarbans acticle and feel that the three small articles that you created in 2011 would be more noticed and appropriate if they are combined with this larger article. I have copied the material from the South, East and West articles to the Sundarbans article in the Geography section. The West one does not have much specific information about it. I wonder what you think of the material being moved here. If it works effectively, the three small articles could be deleted. What do you think? Travers (talk) 02:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of mountains of Bangladesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI

FYI: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#2013_Bangladesh_India_WikiProjects_dispute_resolution.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

'71 genocide

Hi!

Your comments here would be appreciated!--ArmanJ (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

bikini

Just wondering if you've had a chance to stop by the bikini article in recent months and see the effects of the effort made to continue to improve the work? I noted your comments peppered throughout a talk page archive there and so you must've been a primary contributor to the article, hence I thought I'd check in with you, even if several years may have passed since you were regularly involved there. Azx2 17:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I read your feedback on my talk page and made most of the edits you suggested, including deleting the gallery completely, although I used two images from the gallery within the main body of the article, including replacing the WWE wrestlers w/ the beach volleyball shot (Since you were certainly correct about the relative controversies). I also add much more info about the controversies related to bikinis in beach volleyball, and current developments by the FIVB that allowed for uniform changes (shorts instead of bikini bottoms) at London 2012. Thanks again for the feedback - I've tried to garner input via the article's talk page and am active there, just waiting for folks to contribute so it's not just me working on the article lol... Azx2 18:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Really appreciate your recent contributions to bikini, especially the copyediting like what you applied to the sports controversies section. I would've gotten around to it eventually, but it's so nice to have someone else come in and make clearer a section like that that significantly increased in size off of one or two edits. I also agree with your replacement of the microkini picture with the much toned-down pic of model in bikini underwear. I thought that was a very nice touch to add substance to that variant, especially when the focus of the text is on the swimwear version. I understand you're not necessarily a fan of the main image, but I also feel very strongly that it should remain as-is, since it is of tremendous "quality" (not just in a technical sense) and complies with seemingly all of the guidelines in MOS for a lead image, without being shocking or sensationalized and w/o unnecessary objectification imo.

I have one question though: do you understand what the purpose of the final line in the article is (Faced with sexpot supermodels and the cult of body consciousness, a shift away from the bikini remains, offering passive resistance to the concept that "if you've got it, you have to flaunt it".), why that quote was selected? I wasn't responsible for it, as it predated my interest in the article, but I don't understand what it's to convey and wonder if it's not an attempt at editorializing something? Idk tho, so if you have any thoughts on that, or would suggest a different means of concluding that section and the article, I'd be keen to hear it. Thanks again, and hoping you can continue to make any necessary contributions to the article at present. Cheers. Azx2 22:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello again. Wondering if you could return to bikini and please take a quick & urgent look at the new section-addition someone made at the beginning of main article body. They created an entirely new section on the etymology of the word bikini, which has some interesting, new material but which also repeats much of what's in the main history section. I think the new material could simply be integrated into the history section and doesn't require its own independent section, and certainly not as the first part of the main article text. Even if you don't have time to make any edit to this material, would you provide your feedback as to what you think should happen to it, if anything? Thanks... Azx2 21:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Aditya! Just a heads up that since the BIKINI article has entered into a period of "stability", with us three most prolific contributors having concluded our most active periods editing and improving the article, I made the Good Article Nomination... Hopefully the bikini-nomination gets picked up for review soon and we don't have to wait months. But I wanted to notify you and Btphelps so that you would be aware of the nomination and hopefully available to respond to a reviewer should one materialize. Hopefully any reviewer considering the article will also notify both of you if they proceed so that you could respond. And I also wanted to make you aware of the GAN so that any reviewer would see that whatever the differences are that may have informed your perspectives in editing the article, it IS stable and not subject to any edit warring whatsoever, that anything initially viewed as contentious has either been re-evaluated or otherwise resolved. Thanks! Azx2 19:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello

I think you’re probably the only real encyclopaedic editor from Bangladesh. Can you please review the new additions and edits of the Bangladesh lead? Thanks.--203.112.78.5 (talk) 18:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss Süddeutschland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Miss Süddeutschland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Inanygivenhole (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

I would expect so. Aditya 23:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Aditya Kabir. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 14:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Boli khela

To be frank, I could use some help on how that's done. Morinae (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for nominating Shahbag as a featured article. The standards are high and achieving this status takes a lot of work. I am especially interested to see more Bangladeshi topics achieve this level of quality, but I think the initial reviewers are correct in saying that some concerns have to be addressed before it gets to this level. Perhaps try for WP:GA status after responding to the current concerns, and that could be a step toward a more solid promotion to FA in the future. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Service Award!

While looking at through some old material, I came across a vote you made (in 2006 or 2007!) regarding the Service Awards, and you said something like "SHOUTING REALLY LOUD: KEEP KEEP KEEP!" So I guess you like them, or did then anyway. But you don't have yours! Here it is.

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cleavage (breasts) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/d%C3%A9collet%C3%A9 The Free Dictionary]</ref> In current ]) is the upper part of a woman's ], between her waist and neck, comprising her neck,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cleavage (breasts), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves Saint Laurent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jenny van Tassel.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jenny van Tassel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for some of your uploads

Thanks for your uploads to Misplaced Pages. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

• File:Israt Manzil.jpg
• File:Jalsaghar.jpg
• File:Ramna Racecourse.jpg
• File:HakimHRahman.JPG

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bikini waxing

Please clarify how you think this edit improves, or benefits the encyclopedia?

As per wp:notaforum I am perfectly within my rights to remove any post that claims "Pubic-waxing arose with pop-music lyrics about cuttin', rippin', and killin' ho's and bitches, when football-players were idolized for murdering or assaulting wives and girlfriends. Some men cannot perceive of sex (or ANY pleasure, sexual or not) in terms different from dog-fighting and car-crashes, and anything that degrades their partner feeds their psychopathic frenzy. Turning adult women into little children by waxing off their attributes of adultness is part of this sick game".

At best, this is ignorant soapboxing, and at worst blatant trolling - both of which are valid reasons for removal. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Tajuddin Ahmad

Hello. Can I have some help refining the intro in this article? --31.205.56.85 (talk) 07:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Will take a look. Aditya 10:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BirSreshthoColors.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Bikini

Please open a WP:PR and I will review it.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fur bikini of Raquel Welch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 25 November 2012 }}</ref> The iconic pose of Welch was taken by the ] (as recalled by Welch in an interview<ref name="Menshealth"/>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bikini in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pageant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Jayne Mansfield Page

Hi, sorry for late reply. Sure I can help. I can go through it in more detail but did you have anything specific in mind? Thx :) Presto808 (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bikini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vatican

Bikini in popular culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bars

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of private airlines and aeronautical institutions in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Aditiya Kabir, This is for you :)

Confusedfarista (talk) 04:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Bangladesh

Hi, Aditya -- I just thought I'd ask you whether you approve of the recent edits to Bangladesh. I believe I recall that there was a discussion at some point on the Talk page about the language. I'll let you decide whether the changes to content in the article are correct, but after you decide that, grammatical errors in the new material must be addressed, including "it's" when it should be "its" and "there are some amount of" would need to be corrected. I'll await your review and any changes you make. CorinneSD (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Looks like Bazaan undid most of them. CorinneSD (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi CorinneSD. I couldn't find the edits you are referring to. Can you post some defs? Aditya 03:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Aditya (is it Aditya or Aditva? I see both.), but I don't know what you mean by "defs". I assume you mean some sort of link to the actual edits, but I don't know how to create that kind of link. I looked again at the revision history for Bangladesh and I see that you have also made an edit. If you go back a few edits, you will see that, on March 10, Bazaan undid the edits of an editor with a user name that is not in English letters, with an edit summary saying "partial rv of good faith edits, these matters already have a consensus. please discuss your changes first before making them". After that, it goes back and forth a bit. Those March 10 edits were the ones I was concerned about. I guess I shouldn't be so concerned and should just wait a bit; I forget sometimes that other editors have the articles on their watchlists. CorinneSD (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. I was only looking for your edits getting reverted. Checking the edits of the non-english named editor's getting reverted. Aditya 16:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

See my additional comment on the article's talk page. CorinneSD (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bikini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tank top (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Rural schools vs. private university?

Hello, I think you did not notice the recent Talk:Bangladesh page. I am open to discussion about pictures. (Mohd. Toukir Hamid (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC))

Mind you,

Stop being a snob, Ms Kabir. Have you ever seen me edit warring with anyone? Don't accuse me of shit.--Bazaan (talk) 03:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)